On Dec 18, 2014, at 06:57 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >However, I'd be happier if we could communicate that status more >explicitly through the PEP process, especially as I think such a >capability would be useful more generally as we move towards >implementing metadata 2.0 and potentially other enhancements for pip >7+ next year. > >If folks are OK with this idea, I'll go ahead and make the appropriate >changes to PEP 1 and the PEP index generator. I'm also happy to file a >tracker issue, or write a short PEP, if folks feel making such a >change requires a little more formality in its own right.
Hi Nick. What specific changes do you propose to PEP 1 and/or the PEP process? FWIW, if they are fairly simple, then I think a tracker issue with at least the PEP 1 authors nosied would be fine. Cheers, -Barry _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com