Since the bursting of "the bubble economy," Japanese industries have been constrained by Japan's high-cost economic structure and huge domestic demand-supply gap, which now amounts to over ten-trillion yen. The Japanese government has already boosted demand through economic stimulus measures and major tax reductions. In order to put Japan back on track towards stable economic development, it is now essential to strengthen industrial competitiveness, especially through supply-side restructuring.
The government should provide an adequate environment to encourage the supply-side restructuring; this restructuring should be based on individual corporate initiative to meet structural changes on the demand-side. Restructuring will lead to sound corporate operation and financial stability, contribute to Japan's industrial competitiveness, and ensure and expand employment.
Under the strong leadership of Prime Minister Keizo Obuchi, the Japanese government must take prompt actions to create an environment suitable for supply-side restructuring. Keidanren takes this opportunity to offer concrete proposals that will help create such an environment, particularly regarding legislative and tax measures that call for urgent attention.
Supply side restructuring, especially in the manufacturing sector, is essential for Japan to maintain and enhance its industrial competitiveness. In order to enable Japanese firms to quickly respond to an ever changing business environment, the government must make integrated efforts for the revision of legal and tax frameworks concerning the restructuring of business organizations and groups.
Global competition requires Japanese firms to respond quickly to economic and social changes through the restructuring of their own business operations. Firms need to reorganize their forms of enterprises through such means as spin-offs, exchanges of stock, and mergers. To facilitate such actions, prompt steps must be taken to establish the necessary laws and tax regulations.
The Japanese tax system is less favorable to business activities than the tax systems of other countries. A drastic review of the tax system is needed in order for Japanese firms to maintain and strengthen their international competitiveness.
Corporate tax reforms should enhance economic vitality. Currently, the introduction of a tax assessment system based on a business's size is being debated. Such an assessment, which merely aims to fill regional public coffers, will increase the fixed cost of business and obstruct economic revitalization. The ill effect that this type of an assessment system has had on economic activities in Germany and France has led to those two countries to reconsider their decision to use this means of tax assessment. Such a form of taxation also would hinder current efforts to simplify the tax system, and lighten the burden on tax payment and tax collection work.
To encourage Japanese firms to resolve excess capacities and switch to new business activities, the government should introduce a bold and fixed-term tax policy.
In a free market economy, companies withdraw from the market if they have lost out to competition. Legal institutions, however, should assist companies in getting back on their feet if they have a reasonable potential for revitalization, and if restructuring efforts are successfully proceeding in the company's industrial sector.
In addition to the more efficient use of financial capital, the improvement of labor productivity is another key factor necessary to strengthen the competitiveness of Japanese firms.
Firms have a social responsibility to make the utmost effort to create and secure employment. In the medium to long term, lower birthrates and the aging of the population will reduce the size of the labor force in Japan. Japanese firms, however, will not be able to succeed against global competition if they stick to the conventional approach of maintaining redundant workers while switching to a new business.
In the field of employment, appropriate measures should be taken to overcome today's difficult situation. It is vital to prepare safety nets to protect against changes in the business environment. Particularly necessary are laws that will help resolve labor supply-and-demand imbalances, and a new employment insurance system which will emphasize improvement of vocational competence.
At the same time, positive measures should be taken to expand job opportunities; to assist the emergence of new businesses in the fields of medical care, public welfare, information and telecommunications; to invite foreign companies into Japan and promote investment in Japan.
Effective use of real estate such as former factory sites and increase of their market fluidity have vital importance to Japanese firms. Firms should promote closer collaboration with regional governments as well as with private developers at the stages of planing and execution of redevelopment projects. The government should flexibly apply regulations related to land utilization and provide public infrastructure that facilitates the projects.
* * * * *