faqs.org - Internet FAQ Archives

RFC 40 - More Comments on the Forthcoming Protocol


Or Display the document by number



Network Working Group E. Harslem
Request for Comments: 40 J. Heafner
 RAND
 March 1970
 More Comments on the Forthcoming Protocol
We have recently discussed NWG/RFC Nos. 36 and 39 with Steve Crocker,
UCLA. Steve has asked that we elaborate on the errors, queries, and
HOST status that were mentioned in NWG/RFC #39.
Please voice your opinions soon in order to affect the forthcoming
protocol specifications.
ERROR MESSAGES
 <ERR> <Code> <Command length> <Command in error>
<Code> is an eight-bit field that specifies the error type. The
assigned codes are shown below. <Command length> is a 16-bit integer
that indicates the length of the <Command in error> in bits. The
<Command in error> is the spurious command.
The ranges of <Code> are shown below in hexidecimal.
 00 Unspecified error types
 10-0F Resource errors
 10-1F Status errors
 20-2F Content errors
 30-3F Unused
Specific values of <Code> are shown below with their meaning.
 <Code> value Semantics
 00 Unspecified errors.
 01 Request for an invalid resource.
 02 Request for an exhausted resource, try later.
 03-0F Unused.
 10 Invalid <RSM>, i.e., link connected but unblocked.
 11 Invalid <SPD>.
 12 Invalid <ASG>, i.e., connected but no <RDY>
 received.
 13 Message received on blocked link.
 14-1F Unused.
 20 Unknown command code.
 21 Message received on unconnected link.
 22 Invalid <RFC>.
 23 Invalid <CLS>.
 24 Invalid <RSM>, i.e., link not connected.
 25 Invalid <FND>.
 26 Invalid <END>.
 27 Invalid <RDY>.
 28 Invalid <ASG>, i.e., not connected.
 29-2F Unused.
 30-FF Unused.
QUERIES
 <QRY> <My Socket>
or <RPY> <Your Socket> <Text>
The <QRY> is the query indicated in NWG/RFC #39 and <RPY> is the reply.
The format of <Text> is shown below; also refer to NWG/RFC #36, p. 3.
<Text>::= <16 bit count of relevant connection table entries>
 <relevant connection table entries>
<relevant connection table entries>::=
 <relevant connection table entries>
 <a relevant connection table entry>
 <a relevant connection table entry>
<a relevant connection table entry>::= <local socket> <foreign socket>
 <link> <connection state>
 <flow state and buffer control>
 <reconnection control state>
 <NOP>
An NCP may be up, down, pending, etc. When an NCP changes its
state to UP it should send a <NOP> to each remote NCP which
indicates the NCP is available. The sending NCP can then
construct a vector of HOST status from the RFNMs it receives. An
NCP receiving a <NOP> can update the availability of the sending
NCP in its HOST status vector.
 [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
 [ into the online RFC archives by Richard Ames 6/97 ]

User Contributions:

Comment about this RFC, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:




AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /