faqs.org - Internet FAQ Archives

RFC 2928 - Initial IPv6 Sub-TLA ID Assignments


Or Display the document by number



Network Working Group R. Hinden
Request for Comments: 2928 Nokia
Category: Informational S. Deering
 Cisco
 R. Fink
 LBNL
 T. Hain
 Microsoft
 September 2000
 Initial IPv6 Sub-TLA ID Assignments
Status of this Memo
 This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
 not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
 memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
 This document defines initial assignments of IPv6 Sub-Top-Level
 Aggregation Identifiers (Sub-TLA ID) to the Address Registries. It
 is intended as technical input to the Internet Assigned Numbers
 Authority (IANA) from the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
 Internet Protocol Next Generation (IPNG) and Next Generation
 Transition (NGTRANS) working groups, as an input to the process of
 developing guidelines for the allocation of IPv6 addresses.
 This document was originally developed to provide advice to IANA in
 the fall of 1998 and is being published at this time for the
 historical record. The Internet Architecture Board (IAB)
 subsequently requested that the IANA delegate these assignments to
 the Address Registries. The IANA did this and the Address Registries
 are now using them to assign IPv6 addresses.
1. Introduction
 This document was originally developed to provide advice to IANA in
 the fall of 1998 and is being published at this time for the
 historical record. The IAB subsequently requested that the IANA
 delegate these assignments to the Address Registries. The IANA did
 this and the Address Registries are now using them to assign IPv6
 addresses.
 This document defines initial assignments of IPv6 Sub-TLA Aggregation
 Identifiers (Sub-TLA ID) to the Address Registries. It is intended
 as technical input to the IANA from the IETF IP Next Generation
 (IPNG) and Next Generation Transition (NGTRANS) working groups, as an
 input to the process of developing guidelines for the allocation of
 IPv6 addresses.
 The IAB and IESG have authorized the Internet Assigned Numbers
 Authority (IANA) as the appropriate entity to have the responsibility
 for the management of the IPv6 address space as defined in [ALLOC].
 The proposed initial assignment described in the document is
 consistent with:
 - RFC 2373,"IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture" [ARCH]
 - RFC 2374 "An Aggregatable Global Unicast Address Format" [AGGR]
 - RFC 2450 "Proposed TLA and NLA Assignment Rules" [TLA-RULES]
2. Background
 [TLA-RULES] specifies that TLA assignments will be done in two
 stages. The first stage is to allocate a Sub-TLA ID. This document
 specifies the initial assignments of Sub-TLA ID's to the Registries.
 As defined in [TLA-RULES] Section 5.1:
 "Sub-TLA ID's are assigned out of TLA ID 0x0001 as follows. Note
 that use of the Reserved field to create the Sub-TLA field is
 specific to TLA ID 0x0001. It does not affect any other TLA.
 | 3 | 13 | 13 | 19 |
 +----+----------+---------+---------------+
 | FP | TLA | Sub-TLA | NLA |
 | | ID | | ID |
 +----+----------+---------+---------------+
 where:
 FP = 001 = Format Prefix
 This is the Format Prefix used to identify aggregatable global
 unicast addresses.
 TLA ID = 0x0001 = Top-Level Aggregation Identifier
 This is the TLA ID assigned by the IANA for Sub-TLA
 allocation.
 Sub-TLA ID = Sub-TLA Aggregation Identifier
 The Sub-TLA ID field is used by the registries for initial
 allocations to organizations meeting the requirements in
 Section 5.2 of this document. The IANA will assign small
 blocks (e.g., few hundred) of Sub-TLA ID's to registries. The
 registries will assign the Sub-TLA ID's to organizations
 meeting the requirements specified in Section 5.2. When the
 registries have assigned all of their Sub-TLA ID's they can
 request that the IANA give them another block. The blocks do
 not have to be contiguous. The IANA may also assign Sub-TLA
 ID's to organizations directly. This includes the temporary
 TLA assignment for testing and experimental usage for
 activities such as the 6bone or new approaches like exchanges.
 NLA ID = Next-Level Aggregation Identifier
 Next-Level Aggregation ID's are used by organizations assigned
 a TLA ID to create an addressing hierarchy and to identify
 sites. The organization can assign the top part of the NLA ID
 in a manner to create an addressing hierarchy appropriate to
 its network."
 Note: In the above quote from [TLA-RULES] the references to "Section
 5.2" refer to section 5.2 in [TLA-RULES].
3. Initial Assignments
 As specified in [TLA-RULES], Sub-TLA ID assignments are made in
 blocks. The initial Sub-TLA ID assignments to IP address registries
 are in blocks of 64 Sub-TLA IDs. These assignments are listed below.
 Binary Value IPv6 Prefix Range Assignment
 ---------------- ------------------------------- -------------------
 0000 000X XXXX X 2001:0000::/29 - 2001:01F8::/29 IANA
 0000 001X XXXX X 2001:0200::/29 - 2001:03F8::/29 APNIC
 0000 010X XXXX X 2001:0400::/29 - 2001:05F8::/29 ARIN
 0000 011X XXXX X 2001:0600::/29 - 2001:07F8::/29 RIPE NCC
 0000 100X XXXX X 2001:0800::/29 - 2001:09F8::/29 (future assignment)
 0000 101X XXXX X 2001:0A00::/29 - 2001:0BF8::/29 (future assignment)
 0000 110X XXXX X 2001:0C00::/29 - 2001:0DF8::/29 (future assignment)
 0000 111X XXXX X 2001:0E00::/29 - 2001:0FF8::/29 (future assignment)
 0001 000X XXXX X 2001:1000::/29 - 2001:11F8::/29 (future assignment)
 . . .
 . . .
 . . .
 1111 111X XXXX X 2001:FE00::/29 - 2001:FFF8::/29 (future assignment)
 Where "X" indicates "0" or "1".
 All other Sub-TLA ID values not listed above are reserved.
 When a registry has assigned all of the Sub-TLA IDs in their block
 they can request that the IANA provide another block. The blocks
 assigned to a registry do not have to be contiguous.
 The block of Sub-TLA IDs assigned to the IANA (i.e., 2001:0000::/29 -
 2001:01F8::/29) is for assignment for testing and experimental usage
 to support activities such as the 6bone, and for new approaches like
 exchanges.
4. Acknowledgments
 The authors would like to express their thanks to Joyce K. Reynolds,
 Thomas Narten, Kim Hubbard, Mirjam Kuehne, and Brian Carpenter for
 their help with this document.
5. Security Considerations
 IPv6 addressing documents do not have any direct impact on Internet
 infrastructure security. Authentication of IPv6 packets is defined
 in [AUTH]. Authentication of the ownership of prefixes to avoid
 "prefix stealing" is a related security issue but is beyond the scope
 of this document.
6. References
 [AGGR] Hinden, R., Deering, S. and M. O'Dell, "An Aggregatable
 Global Unicast Address Format", RFC 2374, July 1998.
 [ALLOC] IAB and IESG, "IPv6 Address Allocation Management", RFC
 1881, December 1995.
 [ARCH] Hinden, R., "IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture", RFC
 2373, July 1998.
 [AUTH] Kent, S. and R. Atkinson, "IP Authentication Header", RFC
 2402, November 1998.
 [IPV6] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6
 (IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, December 1998.
 [RFC2026] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision
 3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, October 1996.
 [TLA-RULES] Hinden, R., "Proposed TLA and NLA Assignment Rules", RFC
 2450, December 1998.
 [TST-ALLOC] Hinden, R., Fink R. and J. Postel, "IPv6 Testing Address
 Allocation", RFC 2471, December 1998.
7. Authors' Addresses
 Robert M. Hinden
 Nokia
 313 Fairchild Drive
 Mountain View, CA 94043
 USA
 Phone: +1 650 625-2004
 EMail: hinden@iprg.nokia.com
 Stephen E. Deering
 Cisco Systems, Inc.
 170 West Tasman Drive
 San Jose, CA 95134-1706
 USA
 Phone: +1 408 527-8213
 EMail: deering@cisco.com
 Robert L. Fink
 Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
 1 Cyclotron Rd.
 Bldg 50A, Room 3111
 Berkeley, CA 94720
 USA
 Phone: +1 510 486-5692
 EMail: rlfink@lbl.gov
 Tony Hain
 Microsoft
 Phone: +1 425 703-6619
 EMail: tonyhain@microsoft.com
8. Full Copyright Statement
 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved.
 This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
 others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
 or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
 and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
 kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
 included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
 document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
 the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
 Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
 developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
 copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
 followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
 English.
 The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
 revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
 This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
 "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
 TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
 BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
 HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
 MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
 Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
 Internet Society.

User Contributions:

Comment about this RFC, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:




AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /