| Re: Spamhuas Thumbs Nose at Eleven Million Dollar Judgment Against It |
|---|
> Loethen said if Spamhaus ignores the ruling "we will seek alternate
> means of enforcing the judgment through the court system in the
> U.S. and potentially the U.K."
> "Spamhaus is thumbing its nose at the U.S. courts by failing to
> participate in the process, failing to provide information in the
> court case, and failing to comply with the orders of the court,"
> Loethen said.
The views of Spamhaus can be found at
http://www.spamhaus.org/legal/answer.lasso?ref=1
with this gem as last paragraph:
"A TRO, and indeed any ruling whatsoever issued by a United States
County, State or Federal Court has no validity in the United Kingdom
unless jurisdiction is proven to a British Court. Therefore Spamhaus
correctly ignored the TRO and advises Mr. Linhardt to re-file his case
in a British court when he can prove jurisdiction, but advises
Mr. Linhardt that British courts do not accept US-style 'SLAPP' suits
and impose penalties for lying to the court."
koos@kzdoos.xs4all.nl or RSA/1024 0xCA845CB5 -?)
Fax +31-30-2817051 Camp Wireless, wireless Internet access /\\
http://idefix.net/~koos/ at campsites http://www.camp-wireless.org/ _\_V