TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Re: GTE and Verizon; SBC and AT&T, in Southern California

Sam Spade (Sam@coldmail.com)
2006年7月29日 06:50:05 -0700

• Review Index Sorted By: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com: "Re: GTE and Verizon; SBC and AT&T, in Southern California"
• Previous message: Steven Lichter: "Re: GTE and Verizon; SBC and AT&T, in Southern California"
• May be in reply to: Anthony Bellanga: "GTE and Verizon; SBC and AT&T, in Southern California"
• Next in thread: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com: "Re: GTE and Verizon; SBC and AT&T, in Southern California"
• TELECOM Digest: Home Page

Steve Sobol wrote:

> 90 miles west, in the Antelope Valley on the L.A. County side of the
> High Desert, it's all PacBell/SBC/at&t.

Contel was never in the LA Basin. It had the Victor Valley and up to
Ridgecrest and the Eastern Sierra. The Eastern Sierra was originally
served by a local LEC.

Barstow is, and was, Bell territory because it was a regional toll
center way back when.

Palmdale is, and was Bell, but Lancaster was GTE.

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply

Go to Next message: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com: "Re: GTE and Verizon; SBC and AT&T, in Southern California"

Go to Previous message: Steven Lichter: "Re: GTE and Verizon; SBC and AT&T, in Southern California"

May be in reply to: Anthony Bellanga: "GTE and Verizon; SBC and AT&T, in Southern California"

Next in thread: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com: "Re: GTE and Verizon; SBC and AT&T, in Southern California"

TELECOM Digest: Home Page