| Editorial: Gambling Prohibition Bill Flops on Principle |
|---|
Rep. Goodlatte's morally inspiring words, however, weren't entirely
true.
The bill does close a loophole in current law that has allowed
offshore casinos and casinos in states where gambling is legal to
accept online bets from residents of all 50 states. But it falls far
short of prohibiting Internet gambling.
The House, for instance, carved out an exception for online interstate
betting on horse racing. It also creates intrastate exceptions for
Indian casinos and for lotteries.
So online gambling is a scourge if it's done with a non-Indian casino,
but not if it's done with a state lottery. And young people and
families need to be protected from betting on dogs, but betting on
horses is a wholesome activity.
Far from being a strong measure against gambling, the Internet
Gambling Prohibition and Enforcement Act is a demonstration of
politics as usual in Washington. Interest groups with lobbying muscle
on Capitol Hill got their exemptions, while legal brick and mortar
casinos in the United States created a financial obstacle for their
foreign, online competition.
Whether you support or oppose gambling is a matter of principle. A
House measure that feigns gambling prohibition is about as
unprincipled as playing poker with a marked deck of cards.