Issue731328
Created on 2003年05月02日 12:56 by niederberger, last changed 2022年04月10日 16:08 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files |
|---|
| File name |
Uploaded |
Description |
Edit |
|
bdistrpmrh9.diff
|
niederberger,
2003年05月02日 12:56
|
bdist_rpm patch |
| Messages (6) |
|---|
|
msg43575 - (view) |
Author: Ricardo Niederberger Cabral (niederberger) |
Date: 2003年05月02日 12:56 |
When trying to build an rpm on RH 9:
From distutils __version__ = "1.0.3":
File "distutils/command/bdist_rpm.py", line 316, in run
assert len(rpms) == 1, \
AssertionError: unexpected number of RPM files found: ['build/bdist.
linux-i686/rpm/RPMS/i386/imgSeek-0.7-1.i386.rpm', 'build/bdist.
linux-i686/rpm/RPMS/i386/imgSeek-debuginfo-0.7-1.i386.rpm']
I had to remove the assert statement on bdist_rpm.py:316 in order to
build my rpm since rpmbuild from RH always seems to generate this
extra -debuginfo rpm.
So attached is a patch (cvs rev 1.37) to simply copy all generated
RPM's to the dist/ directory.
|
|
msg43576 - (view) |
Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * (Python committer) |
Date: 2003年05月03日 11:01 |
Logged In: YES
user_id=21627
Can you provide more information? What rpm gets generated,
and what files does it contain?
|
|
msg43577 - (view) |
Author: Ricardo Niederberger Cabral (niederberger) |
Date: 2003年05月28日 01:59 |
Logged In: YES
user_id=354686
Sorry for not replying faster and providing more info. SF tracker didn't email
me about your comment, and I don't have the RH system at hand right now.
Anyway, it generates:
foo-version.i386.rpm
foo-version.src.rpm
foo-debuginfo-version.i386.rpm
instead of only the binary and src rpm's I would get on Mandrake 9 for
example, which is what bdist_rpm.py currently expects.
I don't know exactly what goes inside this debug-info rpm, but i guess it's
probably the binary one compiled with debug symbols on. I can provide
more info if necessary in a few days.
|
|
msg43578 - (view) |
Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * (Python committer) |
Date: 2005年03月03日 14:36 |
Logged In: YES
user_id=1188172
Does anyone still care about this issue?
Or, other way round, does anything speak against applying
and so copying all RPMs?
|
|
msg43579 - (view) |
Author: Sean Reifschneider (jafo) * (Python committer) |
Date: 2006年05月22日 08:52 |
Logged In: YES
user_id=81797
Is 1.0.3 from the Red Hat RPMs, the python.org RPMs (which
version), or directly downloaded from the distutils? If
this is an issue in Distutils, I'd be interested in still
fixing it. However, there hasn't been any activity on this
in 3 years, so I'm planning on closing this unless I hear
something further over, say, the next few weeks.
Red Hat 9.1 is extremely legacy now, of course. Not at all
supported for errata by either Red Hat or the other Legacy
sites, so I'm inclined to feel the same.
|
|
msg43580 - (view) |
Author: Sean Reifschneider (jafo) * (Python committer) |
Date: 2006年06月13日 12:09 |
Logged In: YES
user_id=81797
No activity on this in the last several weeks. This is
fixed in newer Fedora releases, and Red Hat 9.1 is no longer
supported by Legacy projects.
|
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2022年04月10日 16:08:31 | admin | set | github: 38424 |
| 2003年05月02日 12:56:45 | niederberger | create |