Issue548197
Created on 2002年04月24日 16:31 by bruthasj, last changed 2022年04月10日 16:05 by admin. This issue is now closed.
Files |
File name |
Uploaded |
Description |
Edit |
cookie-urllib2.patch
|
bruthasj,
2002年04月24日 16:31
|
Adds cookie support to urllib2.py |
latest.cookie.patch
|
bruthasj,
2002年06月10日 18:06
|
Removes old 'string' stuff. |
testcookie.py
|
bruthasj,
2002年06月10日 18:10
|
Tests cookie support in urllib2 |
Messages (6) |
msg39691 - (view) |
Author: Jeff Pitman (bruthasj) |
Date: 2002年04月24日 16:31 |
Problem
Whenever urllib2 encounters a complex sequence of redirects
and authentication schemes it is extremely difficult to
"inject" Cookie headers to each request.
Solution
Make a small change to AbstractHTTPHandler that will detect on
a host-by-host basis if there are any stored cookies. This is
done by using a Dict that is initialized on import of urllib2.
Therefore the Dict of Hosts is available throughout multiple
instances of request objects and multiple urlopens on those
objects.
Upon detection, it will send the Cookies along with the other
request headers to the host. If there isn't any, it just
skips it.
The next thing is to collect the Cookies when we get the
"reply" from the host. All of this is done within
AbstractHTTPHandler -- no other modifications required.
Test
I can login into http://mantisbt.sf.net/ which requires the
browser to maintain a set of cookies during the session.
Future
* Maybe use external files to store and control storage of
cookies
* Better API in Cookie module so we don't have to do the
string.split hack
* Better API in urllib2 for Cookies (or just make it
transparent? or both?)
|
msg39692 - (view) |
Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * (Python committer) |
Date: 2002年05月30日 18:20 |
Logged In: YES
user_id=80475
I think this looks good.
Please resubmit patch using the latest version of
urllib2.py and using string methods instead of the (about
to be deprecated) string module.
|
msg39693 - (view) |
Author: Moshe Zadka (moshez) (Python triager) |
Date: 2002年06月11日 11:22 |
Logged In: YES
user_id=11645
You're giving no control at all to the Python user over
cookies. Additionally, doing it on a per-import
basis is wrong: what if there are two non-co-operating
modules each using urllib2 for their own purposes?.
I suggest writing a Cookie mixin which people can mixin to
their classes
when they create a manager, which will keep a list of
cookies and so on.
Thanks.
|
msg39694 - (view) |
Author: John J Lee (jjlee) |
Date: 2002年12月09日 20:50 |
Logged In: YES
user_id=261020
I just noticed the thread on c.l.py about this, rather late... a day
before that thread started (great minds think alike, apparently),
I released the first version of this:
http://wwwsearch.sourceforge.net/ClientCookie
I intend eventually to get it into a fit state for inclusion in Python.
It's certainly not there yet, but it does work, and is integrated
with urllib2.
|
msg39695 - (view) |
Author: John J Lee (jjlee) |
Date: 2004年06月02日 22:41 |
Logged In: YES
user_id=261020
This should be closed, since it's obsoleted by the new
module cookielib (patch 963318).
|
msg39696 - (view) |
Author: Johannes Gijsbers (jlgijsbers) * (Python triager) |
Date: 2004年08月14日 11:33 |
Logged In: YES
user_id=469548
Closing as outdated.
|
History
|
---|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2022年04月10日 16:05:15 | admin | set | github: 36494 |
2002年04月24日 16:31:35 | bruthasj | create |