Issue1501934
Created on 2006年06月06日 23:57 by twouters, last changed 2022年04月11日 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (6) |
|
msg28729 - (view) |
Author: Thomas Wouters (twouters) * (Python committer) |
Date: 2006年06月06日 23:57 |
Python 2.5 compiles the following piece of code
differently than Python 2.4:
g = 1
def f():
g += 1
In Python 2.4, this raises an UnboundLocalError. In
current svn trunk, it will increment the global g by 1.
(dis.dis shows that it actually compiles into
LOAD/STORE_GLOBAL opcodes.) It seems the compiler
doesn't treat augmented assignment as assignment for
the purpose of determining locals, as this still fails
correctly:
g = 1
def f():
g += 1
g = 5
I can't find where this optimization happens nowadays,
but it feels like a short fix.
|
|
msg28730 - (view) |
Author: Thomas Wouters (twouters) * (Python committer) |
Date: 2006年06月19日 17:44 |
Logged In: YES
user_id=34209
Possibly related is the discovery of free variables (used
when forming closures) and optimized-out codeblocks:
>>> def foo(x):
... def bar():
... if 0:
... print x
... return bar
In 2.4, there is no closure:
>>> foo.func_code.co_cellvars
()
>>> foo(5).func_closure
>>>
In 2.5, there is:
>>> foo.func_code.co_cellvars
('x',)
>>> foo(5).func_closure
(<cell at 0x2b9abf6d7e30: int object at 0x6b6580>,)
(I don't think it's unreasonable to declare the old
behaviour bugged, though :-)
|
|
msg28731 - (view) |
Author: Neil Schemenauer (nascheme) * (Python committer) |
Date: 2006年06月30日 16:22 |
Logged In: YES
user_id=35752
Here are some notes in case I wear out before finding a fix.
analyze_name() gets to the SET_SCOPE(dict, name,
GLOBAL_IMPLICIT) line because the name does not have the
DEF_LOCAL flag set as it should. It does not have DEF_LOCAL
because Name.ctx for 'g' is Load. I believe there should be
a set_context() call in ast_for_expr_stmt, as flagged as
TODO by Jeremy. Maybe set_context(..., Store, ...) would
work or maybe things need to be changed to allow ctx to have
AugAssign as a value.
|
|
msg28732 - (view) |
Author: Neil Schemenauer (nascheme) * (Python committer) |
Date: 2006年06月30日 17:51 |
Logged In: YES
user_id=35752
I've got a simple fix that seems to work. I feel this part
of the compiler could use some more serious cleanups but
probably not for 2.5. Note that test_ast fails after
applying my patch. I haven't had time to look into that yet
but I think it's shallow.
|
|
msg28733 - (view) |
Author: Neil Schemenauer (nascheme) * (Python committer) |
Date: 2006年06月30日 22:03 |
Logged In: YES
user_id=35752
Adding a patch to "fix" test_ast.py. I have no idea what
the test is trying to verify. It looks like it was written
by martin.v.loewis so maybe he can comment.
|
|
msg28734 - (view) |
Author: Neil Schemenauer (nascheme) * (Python committer) |
Date: 2006年07月09日 16:17 |
Logged In: YES
user_id=35752
Checked in as SVN rev 50493.
|
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2022年04月11日 14:56:17 | admin | set | github: 43467 |
| 2006年06月06日 23:57:54 | twouters | create |