WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] Yum repo for XCP (ex: XCP acpi shutdown)

To: George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Yum repo for XCP (ex: XCP acpi shutdown)
From: Grant McWilliams <grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2011年10月26日 10:04:39 -0700
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2011年10月26日 10:11:57 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=cr71ll56RUUWyCx8E43jk+fWRYYu5OqkBbWW31b73i8=; b=osYUiIX3FAGCvVNXpy0V8xUQcjE+8eVt9Fn+VdKZZVk2t9nVuKOq5xu1j3hevLVcK/ slEcOytVnyxdOVrIx5pH9WpGYOupxtLJ/5UH8sQy5sTlySFlW78WXICm4KM0EpdCQsi7 hbF1wdN3YP47+QT8BIL2rHmGm+yGbWsELgt/I=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4EA7C679.4030804@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAK5Eu=uRLu17+FTBZdqSUgbKUo4p1QHj1YFBWhy0f5F7Xb_9sg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <602C5EB92F9AFB4D89D11B9F5B7F1355160FF2F3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAK5Eu=uH8xG52nRJVO7MaBH9sjzzMRNNQVX0Wc4bCHORj9BqPQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4EA6CB8B.2020709@xxxxxxxxx> <CAGnmK4ybB8tbyyyhxXZ6dvBmGpVbQvCZ4KTHhJbMSU9i+JuAMQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4EA7C679.4030804@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:36 AM, George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Citrix provides updates for XenServer, but not for XCP.

But in any way, exposing management interface to unprotected network is bad idea. If you have no managed interface available from internet, you have very few vulnerable for remote attack components: kernel, openvswitch... thats all.

Idea behind XCP is well-protected internal network with management interface, unencrypted storage traffic, migration traffic, XCP own synchronization traffic and separate (by VLAN or by different physical interface) network for clients with internet access.



Then why does Citrix provide updates for XenServer?

Let's face it, the real reason is Citrix doesn't want to provide repos for XCP and I understand that but saying it's bad practice to provide updates to XCP and then do it for XenServer is flawed logic.

For those of us who are using XCP in production we need an update system. Perhaps it will be the yum to redhat's RHN but still it's needed.


Grant McWilliams
http://grantmcwilliams.com/

Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use Windows."
Now they have two problems.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: RE: [Xen-users] XCP Test workstation , Brett Westover
Next by Date: Fwd: [Xen-users] Yum repo for XCP (ex: XCP acpi shutdown) , Andrew Wells
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] Yum repo for XCP (ex: XCP acpi shutdown) , George Shuklin
Next by Thread: Fwd: [Xen-users] Yum repo for XCP (ex: XCP acpi shutdown) , Andrew Wells
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /