WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: VM disk I/O limit patch

To: Shaun Reitan <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: VM disk I/O limit patch
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2011年6月27日 11:41:48 -0400
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2011年6月27日 08:51:27 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <iu08lj$l0u1ドル@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20110621162935.F4A1.3A8D29D5@xxxxxxxxxx> <iu08lj$l0u1ドル@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010年09月15日)
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 01:45:36PM -0700, Shaun Reitan wrote:
> Does this match only limit throughput or can it also limit the guest
> by disk IOPS? christopher aker had a patch way back for UML that
Just throughpout.
> did disk based qos. What i really liked about that patch was that
> it allowed for bursting by using a bucket. If i remember correctly
> you specified that a guest's bucket could hold say 4000 tokens, and
> the bucket would be filled with 10 tokens a second. Each IO took
> one token from the bucket. When the bucket was empty IO was paused
> and processed as the bucket was filled. This allowed a guest to
> burst for a short period of time until that bucket was empty and
> then it would slowely be filled back up.
Uhhh... are you sure you are talking about the same patch.
>
> Also what was nice is that the guest had a /proc/ entry that told
> the customer how many tokens they currently had in their bucket.
OK.. but how would this help the customers? They don't have access
to the /proc in Dom0.
>
> I would like to see somthing like this in Xen, I've even thought
> about posting to the devel forums seeing if somebody wanted to write
> one for $$$
Why not use dm-ioband (here is a doc about it:
http://lwn.net/Articles/344441/) which has much more options and also
provide the bucket and tokens you are looking for.
[edit: Looks like dm-ioband never made it in the Linux kernel. But there
was something that I thought Vivek wrote that was superior to dm-ioband..
Ah, yes: blkio-controller.txt.
Look in Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] NAT networking in Xen , Iordan Iordanov
Next by Date: AW: [Xen-users] IPv6 with Bridge Modus , Stefan Becker
Previous by Thread: [Xen-devel] Re: VM disk I/O limit patch , Shaun Reitan
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] Re: VM disk I/O limit patch , Shaun Reitan
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /