| To: | Mario <mario@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] openvswitch on xen 4.1 |
| From: | Todd Deshane <todd.deshane@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:44:47 -0400 |
| Cc: | "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | 2011年6月09日 11:46:30 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=dOqjKFTRjTlSEUDifBDQMz/XKUkYhWME93VcINeYNXw=; b=buZzEjLzedwQwft7eqg3Fxucm1cr7zMOwawHlOoyVHlO7CS0+sMz27bELoHFzaEhgo LYd5xL0MqwnPI/5FzyWjh0P/cPj9mukB5R/HFYn3f14mbjOxbFBK8teLr91wg5w8SQvy T34S9ncB4WK8GFA+/VK2Ag34P+0P9kHIN6TLg= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=Lm0+BWnxFJYtnJ+azW0x2u09ADNz1qowzyxgsgU4ozrXdu6g65s+xy9tL8u4nmb6dq yaTEj30+tMLRwxuGxkJS8TEOL+a8DbTzI9UZcl4wm3YVG+AL0xjiDOSvkVIKLaz62XAo WGPH/t3kTVr+hxGc1XVF6kCg0esm6gqhe7NdI= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4DF0D09B.7010109@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <4DF0D09B.7010109@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Mario <mario@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > It seems that /etc/xen/scripts/qemu-ifup is being ignored by xl. This may happen if you have an existing bridge device, since Xen 4.1 networking works a bit differently. http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/MigrationGuideToXen4.1%2B It might still be a bug, but let's try to narrow that down a bit. > My xl.conf has: vifscript="/etc/xen/scripts/vif-openvswitch", and this works > fine for vifX.X devices. In order to make tapX.X work i hacked in the > following: > > ovs-vsctl -- --may-exist add-port ${bridge} ${vif/vif/tap} > Where did you put this line? > Is there a better way to make tap interfaces work ? > > Thanks, > mario > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > -- Todd Deshane http://www.linkedin.com/in/deshantm http://www.xen.org/products/cloudxen.html http://runningxen.com/ _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-users] Xen very very slow on workstation HP Z4000 , Pierre Biland |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] openvswitch on xen 4.1 , Mario |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] openvswitch on xen 4.1 , Mario |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] openvswitch on xen 4.1 , Mario |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |