On 06/10/10 20:19, Javier Guerra Giraldez wrote:

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Jonathan Tripathy<jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I was getting worried that by specifying 25G in both e2fsck and resize2fs
that may have caused problems..

it is somewhat safer not to specify the size to resize2fs and let it
simply use the device's size.
otherwise, you expose yourself to slighly different interpretations of
'25G'. not too likely, but can you be sure that 24.78G is exactly the
same number of bytes to LVM and resize2fs?

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users