| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-users] Questions about 1000HZ Kernel |
| From: | Christian Maile <cmaile@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2010年9月21日 11:51:02 +0200 |
| Delivery-date: | 2010年9月21日 02:52:35 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello, The XEN kernel in "XEN RELEASE-4.0.1" is shipped with the following config parameters: CONFIG_HZ_1000=y CONFIG_HZ=1000 At many blogs and forums there is a discussion that the CONFIG_HZ parameter should be changed to 250 HZ or 300 HZ. We will operate a DomU and the Dom0 with the same 1000HZ Kernel. Is this setup possible and recommended. How high is the performance cut-off? Which option is more suitable for Xen systems? Thanks, Christian _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-users] XCP ethernet jumbo frames???? , Rob Hoes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] dom0 CPU pinning and xm weighting , Pasi Kärkkäinen |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] [XCP] xenwebmanager testers are needed , Alberto González Rodríguez |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Questions about 1000HZ Kernel , Pasi Kärkkäinen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |