| To: | George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] one busy vm affects other vm |
| From: | Aclhk Aclhk <aclhkaclhk@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2010年8月24日 22:09:37 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | 2010年8月24日 22:10:56 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1282712978; bh=psHFkh3rH/Csv++D2NmGZ92+9hSEheqVfhIDjL4zhAw=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=s40qJAaQNj0io8SgATk8enolybZvPTzV3VBLeEXf5sgcPVDnRFT5Wy4ZTXIb2YUwJ+SSKcEN1A067C6/7cHk9fOCKadfW5SkX2RJHPtdE4KQXFcWvc0XjwdOIexgca5KoPgyf6e5wYzdUywxOf2ld8zHHjB7dLsX1rNPghzro0E= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=ymail.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CtUtIXvN+WOcTBhgjgST8FxUctPVJxwuD9ng2mDcQcntdnU+SnoFuVOfMkQAnDx41uqBgoPYuZrINprzn0ksAvxOqn7OZqcg33fs0mzE/nVWd/yTnJjsuA3GMT8D9JP8i3G3OianPflHdRwXau/dF3f0oRXoA8g4H4WzGRxAYAo=; |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1280942433.12792.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
寄件人: George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx>
主題: Re: [Xen-users] one busy vm affects other vm
收件人: "Aclhk Aclhk" <aclhkaclhk@xxxxxxxxx>
副本(CC): xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
日期: 2010年8月4日,星期三,下午5:20Well I saw those problems when running cpuburn... After few iteration I
solve it (not sure) by using CPU cap 99%.
В Срд, 04/08/2010 в 04:25 -0700, Aclhk Aclhk пишет:
> the affected VMs are all linux (centos 5.4) hvm but windows (win2k)
> hvm not affected.
> I am using Xen 3.1.0 in centos 5.4
>
> I have one VM consuming 100% cpu and all other VM (linux)
> become very slow (no ssh and vnc access).
>
> I could access host via ssh but not VM. host cpu is about 95%
> idle using dstat.
>
> Pls advise how to avoid this.
>
>
>
>
> -----內含下列附件-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-users] Monitoring Xen with Zabbix.. , Michael March |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Firewall rules , Rudi Ahlers |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] one busy vm affects other vm , George Shuklin |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-users] XenStore , Jonathan Tripathy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |