WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM

To: "Serge Fonville" <serge.fonville@xxxxxxxxx>, <Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM
From: "Jonathan Tripathy" <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2010年6月14日 17:44:32 +0100
Cc:
Delivery-date: 2010年6月14日 09:45:51 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <46C13AA90DB8844DAB79680243857F0F062078@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1276528151.5069.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <46C13AA90DB8844DAB79680243857F0F06207C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTilUztf4H9zSJexPeXNQNBefkBn5X6gl87amLrQ-@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46C13AA90DB8844DAB79680243857F0F06207D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTim9hMGEhw9_phloHCTp4XDTO8WacHnaZHSVtEl9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46C13AA90DB8844DAB79680243857F0F06207E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTil5rAiG_YkSZBRC6vdwmKhMOh8ic6P0Zcfj87C9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcsL4I9hp26fjtLvRKy0vt3T7qXmWQAAE3Lo
Thread-topic: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM
Can you use LVM with NFS? Is NFS not slower than iSCSI?


From: Serge Fonville [mailto:serge.fonville@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Mon 14/06/2010 17:41
To: Jonathan Tripathy
Cc: Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM

Well, it would be a lot easier (and just as cheap) to use NFS.
The only downside to NFS might be that it is not accessible from Windows.

But it is much simpler to setup. eaisier to maintain, faster to
troubleshoot. test friendlier and a lot more used.

So basically, what benefits does iSCSI offer you, that NFS doesn't?

HTH,

Regards,

Serge Fonville

On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Also, why exactly have you chosen to use iSCSI?
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> There is nothing else that I can afford. What other options are there?



--
http://www.sergefonville.nl

Convince Google!!
They need to support Adsense over SSL
https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=10528
http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/AdSense/thread?tid=1884bc9310d9f923&hl=en

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM , Serge Fonville
Next by Date: [Xen-users] Xen 4.0 crashes with pvops kernel , Cris Daniluk
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM , Serge Fonville
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM , Serge Fonville
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /