WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] Raid1 performance

To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Raid1 performance
From: blub@xxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 20:23:19 +0200
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, blub@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2010年4月08日 11:24:47 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <20100408174003.GS1878@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <a0345a40ad1cf1b28cbf70d5a2084e57.squirrel@xxxxxxxx> <20100408174003.GS1878@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.19
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 07:00:11PM +0200, blub@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>> hello
>> i've been trying to achieve reasonable disk i/o performance on xen.
>> on debian 5.0.4 (xen 3.2.1, kernel 2.6.26) the pv/hvm performance is
>> alright with a raid1 inside the domU. unfortunately the qemu version
>> (0.9.0) does not cover my needs.
>>
>> so i've been trying xen 3.4.2 & 4.0.0rc8 on gentoo (2.6.31)
>> on both versions, the disk i/o performance drops to zero when copying
>> large files. initially the performance is ok (~30mbyte/s) but drops to
>> zero after ~300mb, i've tried it with wget/ftp/scp
>> this happens with both PV & HVM domU's. i've tried multiple nic drivers
>>
>> the performance seems alright if no raid1 is running on the domU
>> i cannot run the domU raid1's on the dom0 since there are multiple dom0s
>> connecting to multiple FC SAN's and the raid1's are done across the
>> SAN's
>>
>> (btw, the performance with raid1's on the SAN's is excellent on dom0)
>>
>> anyone else has experienced this issue?
>>
>
> Did you make sure dom0 has more weight than the domUs, so that it is able
> to process the IO requests?
>
> See: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenBestPractices 
>
> -- Pasi
>
>
yes, the box has 8 physical cores, and the domU test installation only
uses two of them
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] Xen 4 VGA Passthrough - Keyboard/Mouse? , Jeremy Blosser
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] XEN 4.0 boot error , Konto usnetu
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] Raid1 performance , Pasi Kärkkäinen
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] Raid1 performance , Pasi Kärkkäinen
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /