WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Xen-users] bare metal xen hypervisor

To: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "forwebonly@xxxxxx" <forwebonly@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] bare metal xen hypervisor
From: Matej Zary <zary@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2010年3月31日 13:06:58 +0200
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc:
Delivery-date: 2010年3月31日 04:08:40 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <27233642.497547.1270027899125.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb076 >
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1c68e7871003300735q4b7c5e86x5a86609e43165cb0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <90eb1dc71003300815k31c185dau2ddf734f4e76f12a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <27233642.497547.1270027899125.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb076 >
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcrQtWuq7srT5CObQGevqGSVDSUJOwAC8ugg
Thread-topic: [Xen-users] bare metal xen hypervisor
The Dom0 has direct access to hardware, so in general IO operations should be 
faster (better latency). DomUs access to hardware is provided by hypervisor 
using Dom0 - so the bits have "longer" way to roam out of the VM to real 
hardware. 
-----Original Message-----
From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of forwebonly@xxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 11:32 AM
To: balwant singh; Javier Guerra Giraldez
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] bare metal xen hypervisor
Javier Guerra Giraldez wrote:
>Dom0 is in fact as much a VM as any other one running on the machine;
>the only differences are:
That´s a new information for me.
Does that mean that the performance of processes in Dom0 ist not better or 
worse than those in any DomU?
I thought that Dom0 processes have a better latency and general performance 
compares to those in a DomU.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [Xen-users] XCP: is there a way to keep a vm always active , Peter den Hartog
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] XCP: is there a way to keep a vm always active , Vern Burke
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] bare metal xen hypervisor , forwebonly
Next by Thread: [Xen-users] Installing Xen on Fedora Core 11 easy to follow documentation! , Jan Muhammad
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /