WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Xen-users] problem with extra storage via iscsi

To: "'Javier Guerra'" <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] problem with extra storage via iscsi
From: "Artur Linhart - Linux communication" <AL.LINUX@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2008年8月28日 10:03:20 +0200
Cc: 'Gertjan Oude Lohuis' <gertjan@xxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 'Tammo Schuelke' <tas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2008年8月28日 01:04:39 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <90eb1dc70808271045x76ed2702t64ba2a8892640c6d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <vmime.48b5648d.73b.7f4328e012308a20@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <vmime.48b56983.73b.629f06e0b67c5c20@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48B58B4A.9070100@xxxxxxx> <A83FF7161190406FB04534F771339990@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <90eb1dc70808271045x76ed2702t64ba2a8892640c6d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AckIbLYEdFQIzJD6QhWO/Wz7eWw0xQAd5Muw
Hello,
 As far as I know there is the limit 100Mbit at least for the hvm
guests... OK, now we have been spoken about the PV guests, it is true :-)
 Cheers, Artur
-----Original Message-----
From: Javier Guerra [mailto:javier@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 7:46 PM
To: Artur Linhart - Linux communication
Cc: Gertjan Oude Lohuis; Tammo Schuelke; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] problem with extra storage via iscsi
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Artur Linhart - Linux communication
<AL.LINUX@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> From my point of view, Tammo is right...
>
> You write:
> Why would performance be better with an extra layer (dom0)?
>
> - because in DomU You can have as far as I know in maximum 100MBit network
> device, in Dom0 You can use the gigabit (or possible 10Gbit - I did not
> tried it) connection without problems, so any network device should have
> then much more better performance if mapped as block device through
Dom0...
there's no 'hard' limit of DomU network performance. but it's usually
much lower than block device performance.
-- 
Javier
This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway.
http://www.astaro.com
__________ Informace od NOD32 3393 (20080827) __________
Tato zprava byla proverena antivirovym systemem NOD32.
http://www.nod32.cz
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: RE: [Xen-users] Question on default xen network configs , Artur Linhart - Linux communication
Next by Date: [Xen-users] PCI passthrough - pci interrupt gets disabled , Rado Rethmann
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] problem with extra storage via iscsi , Javier Guerra
Next by Thread: RE: [Xen-users] problem with extra storage via iscsi , Robert Dunkley
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /