Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 14. August 2008 04:09 schrieb Fajar A. Nugraha:
> Markus Hochholdinger wrote:
> > The only reason i'm looking forward to use aoe is because the
> > disconnection of malfunctioning storage servers is better handled than
> > with gnbd. gnbd (in "No Cluster" mode) waits forever if the server dies
> > and i had to write my own programs to handle such a situation. aoe just
> > gives i/o error, and that's what i want.
> Is there a reason whay you're not looking at iscsi?
> Redhat's iscsi-initiator-utils (from open-iscsi) has
> node.session.timeo.replacement_timeout, which
> "specify the length of time to wait for session re-establishment before
> failing SCSI commands back to the application when running the Linux
> SCSI Layer error handler". I assume this is what you want.
yes, iscsi is on my list to check again. The last time i tested (software) 
iscsi, it needed a lot more of cpu on both sides as gnbd.
-- 
greetings
eMHa

Attachment: pgpQeCTbWTPAo.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users