| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-users] Xen and networking. |
| From: | tmac <tmacmd@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2007年12月28日 15:28:07 -0500 |
| Delivery-date: | 2007年12月28日 12:28:37 -0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=Y0gp4AUfE5H4l/MvjWs4pRN4ArbHaRZgsMD4Ar9NA/s=; b=n4NXYtWjK2mPMIofGgkJeUrTsSqGVQnfzJFI2yqdSgsHIv71FQf9cJXPWtJh6bmZJptVJE45x+lp8Ld5piykDMaDoOup5XIlBQvACdc85fRRxtlr7Zf/qZz9ErhkdNfS9Zr9bClcQC6oI1/BIT4nnErFB3bKsNvCv0fJGnRbj5Y= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Y6qFmxui8+9iTJMUXocBVWCg4R5ap5mxLGnHdCNb+VPJ0T2y4HP6P2ydkjarnsnAVOFnduNp0ulRpvOUCSVpqGC9QSH48MWC/qVGTKUNpVOcVegs3ocjS1qc3MjIEwFVa4r/d5AeV6rC+lw8P7PQGKRWjNILjZwbmLUn3xyxN+Q= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
I have a beefy machine (Intel dual-quad core, 16GB memory 2 x GigE) I have loaded RHEL5.1-xen on the hardware and have created two logical systems: 4 cpus, 7.5 GB memory 1 x Gige Following RHEL guidelines, I have it set up so that eth0->xenbr0 and eth1->xenbr1 Each of the two RHEL5.1 guests uses one of the interfaces and this is verified at the switch by seeing the unique MAC addresses. If I do a crude test from one guest over nfs, dd if=/dev/zero of=/nfs/test bs=32768 count=32768 This yields almost always 95-100MB/sec When I run two simultaneously, I cannot seem to get above 25MB/sec from each. It starts off with a large burst like each can do 100MB/sec, but then in a couple of seconds, tapers off to the 15-40MB/sec until the dd finishes. Things I have tried (installed on the host and the guests) net.core.rmem_max = 16777216 net.core.wmem_max = 16777216 net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 16777216 net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 65536 16777216 net.ipv4.tcp_no_metrics_save = 1 net.ipv4.tcp_moderate_rcvbuf = 1 # recommended to increase this for 1000 BT or higher net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 2500 sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control=cubic Any ideas? -- --tmac RedHat Certified Engineer #804006984323821 (RHEL4) RedHat Certified Engineer #805007643429572 (RHEL5) Principal Consultant, RABA Technologies _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Routed dom0 setup problem -- second time around , Rich Wales |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-users] Problem starting xend http server , chetan saundankar |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] passing vga=<mode> to xen kernel , Jason Solan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Xen and networking. , Stephan Seitz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |