| To: | "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] Which Debian version? Which xen version? |
| From: | "Arie Goldfeld" <arik.goldfeld@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 4 Dec 2007 09:31:41 +0200 |
| Cc: | "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | 2007年12月03日 23:32:29 -0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=esg9oMmYqBNVwPzqpdwDcLmC0fdx4JK5L2M6CNyKkLA=; b=wgrCF8xkEf+174FYB5dOTXxgLuGP+lMO5hrC9wqYwDw89gET+t4JktLZ97LEK5kW71XdDm5RTl5uZTn7SOGqwoOxfMq/5nGn5LzeqW8bhQk6igz+7LngFtW1v+b8AdKfV2NpXYOYAhK6YUaTB/r7fTubI3qUD7nk9CN5aPmFcec= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=chMzQx5lVoNFiUJo3OpQ4QY8iYytwHigM2e044rKRZ0tghmEOpO5b1dU1Fr9pdGLCwGLMDyALMeAnHuspIgs7MlfoT23BeANkRb1jlp4QXaQuzv6oAF3exsi8+OiXSBPpIA3rcyoASYUx1OqzglKn4GNAwguZr/ybq2ic7zwZWw= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4754B2E7.9070706@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <4753E004.9050002@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4754019B.1080507@xxxxxxx> <4754B2E7.9070706@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Bas van der Vlies wrote:
> Jan Marquardt wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I need an advice on the both mentioned above topics. We will start using
>> Xen to replace some older servers. We are thinking about the following
>> possible combinations:
>>
>> 1. Debian Etch with Xen 3.0 from Debian packages.
>> 2. Debian Etch with Xen 3.1 from Source
>> 3. Debian Lenny with Xen 3.1 from packages.
>>
> I had the same procedure and ended up with Etch and building the
> kernel and utils from source Xen 3.1.1.
>
> Because 3.1.1 version has some improvements over version 3.0.4 for etch.
>
I don't use Debian, but from my experince using vendor-supported Xen
often saves a lot of headaches. I use RHEL 5.1 with bundled xen 3.1 (rpm
version still says 3.0 though), and the upgrade process from RHEL 5 ->
5.1 which includes xen 3->3.1 has been relatively smooth. Xen 3.1 is a
great improvement for me because it has 32-on-64 support and allows
running Opensolaris PV on linux.
If you like Debian, why not try Ubuntu Gutsy? It comes with Xen 3.1.
Regards,
Fajar
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Multiple IP ranges , Sadique Puthen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Multi-bridged system or run services on Dom0? , Sadique Puthen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Which Debian version? Which xen version? , Fajar A. Nugraha |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Which Debian version? Which xen version? , Jan Marquardt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |