WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] Re: Performance Issues: I/O Wait

To: Nick Couchman <Nick.Couchman@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Performance Issues: I/O Wait
From: Stephan Seitz <s.seitz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2007年10月24日 15:17:07 +0200
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2007年10月24日 06:18:02 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <471E5FB7020000990001D6D5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: netz-haut e.K.
References: <471E5FB7020000990001D6D5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022)
Nick Couchman schrieb:
> Stephan,
> Thanks for the tips - I'll give them a try. One clarification - for
> disabling transmission checksums, is that inside the domU or inside
> dom0?
Hi Nick,
I dont' know if it's really necessary, but we're disabling transmission
checksums on every domain including dom0.
Btw. some weeks ago i noticed a thread at the list with problems using
tg3 cards. As we don't own cards with Broadcom Tigon3, i didn't mention.
> Some of the tests was using NFS, but lately I've been testing with iSCSI
> and even local block devices and it seems to happen on those, too,
> though not to the same degree.
This sounds really strange. We've tried different kinds of domU disks and
are currently using dom0 LVM's on locally attached raid arrays. It is
really paranoid, but we avoided disk images with the same filesystem as
the underlaying. so we didn't test ext3 on ext3 or xfs on xfs. Besides
this restriction, we didn't notice any BIG performance problems.
Greetings
Stephan
-- 
Stephan Seitz
Senior System Administrator
*netz-haut* e.K.
multimediale kommunikation
zweierweg 22
97074 würzburg
fon: +49 931 2876247
fax: +49 931 2876248
web: www.netz-haut.de <http://www.netz-haut.de/>
registriergericht: amtsgericht würzburg, hra 5054

Attachment: s_seitz.vcf
Description: Vcard

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [Xen-users] Which CPU for XenExpress? , Mork0075
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Performance Issues: I/O Wait , Nick Couchman
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Performance Issues: I/O Wait , Nick Couchman
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Performance Issues: I/O Wait , Nick Couchman
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /