WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] how to use eth2 instead of eth0 for bridge

To: Artur Linhart - Linux communication <AL.LINUX@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] how to use eth2 instead of eth0 for bridge
From: Christian Horn <chorn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2007年9月17日 20:01:55 +0200
Cc: "'Fischer, Anna'" <anna.fischer@xxxxxx>, "'Gary W. Smith'" <gary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2007年9月17日 11:02:39 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <013501c7f93c$bd49c1b00ドルe8cb10a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <57F9959B46E0FA4D8BA88AEDFBE5829024F506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <013501c7f93c$bd49c1b00ドルe8cb10a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006年08月11日)
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 05:09:26PM +0200, Artur Linhart - Linux communication 
wrote:
>
> But as far as I know even having 1GBit network card, the
> communication of the guests (at least with HVM guests) will still ahve only
> 100 MBis, is it right? 
Nah, thats just what the model of the emulated network-card has as through-
put, you can do more with HVM as you can see from my small benching at
http://fluxcoil.net/doku.php/xen/docs .
> At least on Xen 3.1.0 this is so.. Does anybody know
> if it is a different situation by the paravirtual hosts? Can be somehow
> improved the network traffic for HVM hosts?
Use paravirtualized drivers if you can get those for the OS you are running
under HVM (my benchmark misses the case HVM/paradrivers thou, since para
is the most interesting method and HVM was just a fun here to look at).
Maybe someone has an explanation for the difference throughput
dom0->domU vs. domU->dom0 .
Christian
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Boot Problem with XEN 3.1. , Paradox
Next by Date: [Xen-users] virtual scsi tape? , Dylan Martin
Previous by Thread: RE: [Xen-users] how to use eth2 instead of eth0 for bridge , Artur Linhart - Linux communication
Next by Thread: [Xen-users] xm console/vnc HVM problems , Hu Jia Yi
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /