WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] Re: file-backed vs. block device performance

To: Mark Greenbank <mark.greenbank@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: file-backed vs. block device performance
From: Marco Mililotti <m.mililotti@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2007年4月03日 18:18:57 +0200
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2007年4月03日 09:17:54 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4110a4f0704030616u4da2b5f8k5b046ee8a620a648@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4110a4f0703271012k6687c8b1ndfd80611f78a0f37@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4110a4f0704030616u4da2b5f8k5b046ee8a620a648@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Macintosh/20070221)
Mark Greenbank wrote:
Hi again,
Since I've not heard anything I'm assuming that no metrics exist, right? Would it be appropriate to do a small test? Is anyone interested? I was thinking of setting up and file-backed and partition-backed domain and running lmbench to do some simple benchmarking -- does this sound appropriate?
Hi Mark,
I've done some (basic) fs benchmarking on our setup:
- Sles10/Xen 3.0.2
- Xeon 5130 - 2Ghz
- 4 GB ram
- Disk: 1.2TB on Areca raid controller 1130 on raid6
- FS: xfs for xen VMs
Benchmark done using lmdd, command like:
Write) lmdd.linux of=... bs=1024k count=1000 fsync=1
and
Read) lmdd.linux if=... bs=1024k count=1000 fsync=1
Commands are repeated at least 5 times to ensure no cache influence.
Here are some results:
VM has physical access to a logical volume
 * write -> 209 MB/s
 * read -> 299 MB/s
I've done some tests using file images, too. Results where around 15 MB/s (write) and 18 MB/s (read), If I remember correctly...
If interested I can give you more details.
With respect to native performance we have that the single VM was able
to reach the following % of native speed:
- write: 92%
- read : 88%
This was not intended to be a comprehensive test suite, but only to look
at some numbers wrt physical device utilization.
Regards,
--
-- Marco Mililotti
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."
Benjamin Franklin
--
-- Marco Mililotti
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."
Benjamin Franklin
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] vncviewer configuration problem , trilok nuwal
Next by Date: [Xen-users] Relation between vcpu and sched-credit -c (caping parameter) , Jordi Segues
Previous by Thread: [Xen-users] Re: file-backed vs. block device performance , Mark Greenbank
Next by Thread: [Xen-users] Re: problem in networking , rahul gundecha
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /