WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] 32bit vs 64bit memory usage question

To: "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 32bit vs 64bit memory usage question
From: "Jamie Burns" <fantasticjamieburns@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:31:14 -0000
Delivery-date: 2007年2月05日 08:31:15 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <BAY124-DAV28223A55AFFE7204DD4E6AC990@xxxxxxx> <45C75B4A.6004.246C7084@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for your insight.
But nothing else in my Debian install uses up double memory.
Only XEN.
Why only XEN?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] 32bit vs 64bit memory usage question
On 5 Feb 2007 at 10:00, Tom Miller wrote:
[...]
64 bit pointers and 64 bit memory address slots are twice as big as
corresponding 32 bit ones. So unless you have 4 GB of memory or more,
using 64bit software is actually slower for the system, not faster.
Are you sure? You are not saying that 64-bit programs are twice as large as 32-bit programs, do you? Besides of that I'd expect a 64-bit CPU to load a 64 bit word from memory in the same speed as a 32-bit CPU would load a 32-bit word. Also these
AMD/Intel CPUs seem to have additional registers in 64bit mode.
I think the memory overhead comes from (As Andrew S Tanenbaum explained in one of his books about 10 years ago) the fact that the tables to manage the huge 64 bit
virtual address space are a great deal larger than those for 32-bit.
Finally (as in HP-UX 11), a 64 bit OS does not mean that every program is a 64-bit executable: a 32-bit Shell, Perl and Emacs is sufficient for most users I'd think
;-)
Regards,
Ulrich
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] Which OS is *most* supported for host os? , Henning Sprang
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] 32bit vs 64bit memory usage question , Geoff Streeter
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] 32bit vs 64bit memory usage question , Ulrich Windl
Next by Thread: RE: [Xen-users] 32bit vs 64bit memory usage question , Petersson, Mats
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /