WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] Xen IB code

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Xen IB code
From: Javier Guerra <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年10月14日 08:55:16 -0500
Delivery-date: 2006年10月14日 06:55:28 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <45302F46.90901@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <d2ad857f0610121102k2b4a7ad6x19878385c2f88854@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45302F46.90901@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.1
On Friday 13 October 2006 7:28 pm, Nivedita Singhvi wrote:
> Currently, it's quite behind, and has not been upgraded
> for a while - we've put that work on hold due to working
> on some other things first. If someone else has an interest
> and can get to it first, that would be very welcome :).
that's a pity, and hope it to gain some steam soon. i used to think of IB 
as "yet another niche SAN technology", like a FC-wannabe. but when i saw a 
presentation of IB and Xen, i understood how much better-thought it is, with 
it's 'hardware from userspace' architecture bypassing the kernel to get high 
throughput and low latency, and its 'one virtual card' for each app working 
great to give each DomU direct access to the same card, bypassing the Dom0 
bottleneck.
imagine a small motherboard with just a good IB interface and 100MB ethernet 
(for managing, not SAN/LAN), no disks, in a blade chassis, running Xen.... 
wouldn't that be just great?
-- 
Javier

Attachment: pgp6lSbdlsTin.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] "xm save" works on Windows guest? , Thorolf Godawa
Next by Date: [Xen-users] triple bang with loops / aoe / ocfs2 ? , Tim Post
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] Xen IB code , Nivedita Singhvi
Next by Thread: [Xen-users] 3.0.2 seems not to create bridge , Harm Weites
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /