WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

RE: AW: [Xen-users] HVM problem

To: "Jerry Amundson" <jerry@xxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: AW: [Xen-users] HVM problem
From: "Petersson, Mats" <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年6月27日 17:33:27 +0200
Delivery-date: 2006年6月27日 08:36:39 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200606271007.13147.jerry@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcaZ++Bnt39XvjMTR8uum22ZDVzaqAAAbuOQ
Thread-topic: AW: [Xen-users] HVM problem
> > Yes, Model 43 is an older X2 processor. The SVM-enabled processors 
> > will report this in flags (svm), and you should have a 
> "model" of 67 
> > or something like that to indicate the generation of processor that
> > supports SVM. There may be earlier model numbers that also 
> work - I'm
> > just going by what my current processor says.
>
> Yuk, this is where the Wiki 
> http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/HVM_Compatible_Processors can get 
> ugly... Is the earliest Model number released with SVM support 
> documented anywhere?
I would say any Rev F processor available to the public (i.e. not early
engineering samples or such) that have a Model of 64(0x40)+, should be
fine. I'm 99% sure that the model number of 67 is the public release,
but it may be higher. I'd be very surprised if it's lower, since that
would not be a "good thing" when it comes to software detecting
features(or bugs) by checking model number vs. some fixed constant. 
--
Mats
>
> jerry
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: AW: [Xen-users] copy DomU , Javier Guerra
Next by Date: [Xen-users] Paravirtualizing , mjfeeney
Previous by Thread: Re: AW: [Xen-users] HVM problem , Jerry Amundson
Next by Thread: [Xen-users] How to get free memory based on h/w in Xen , pv
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /