WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] Re: Java non-performant in a domU?

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Java non-performant in a domU?
From: Javier Guerra <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 00:14:55 -0500
Delivery-date: 2006年6月04日 22:17:37 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060605035320.GA20954@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20060605025413.GA19733@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4483A04A.5050006@xxxxxxxxx> <20060605035320.GA20954@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.1
On Sunday 04 June 2006 10:53 pm, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> That's the crazy thing -- we've been monitoring everything we can, and we
> can't find any anomalous bottlenecks. The application is naturally CPU
just a wild guess, but on a heavily multithreaded and multiprocessor system 
like yours, its quite possible that a given JVM could use a non-optimal 
strategy on a Xen system. I think it's important to test different JVM's, 
and different 'bitness' of them (64bit vs. 32bit). Since 32bit x86 is _SO_ 
register-starved, and Xen interferes with the infamous TLS trick, you should 
try to use a 64bit clean system. since you already stated that your software 
can't run on a 64bit JVM, maybe you could get some insight by running a 
benchmark with similar threading and processor requirements, on all 
combinations of 32bit, 64bit, Xen and non-Xen.
in the worst case, you might find that you must delay the Xen deployment until 
your software gets more 64bit-friendly. or maybe you'll find that simply 
changing JVM get's you the lost performance.
-- 
Javier

Attachment: pgpLzvZKftcq3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [Xen-users] Re: Error while creating domain. , Matthew Palmer
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] How to find completion of domU migration? , Arun Babu
Previous by Thread: [Xen-users] Re: Java non-performant in a domU? , Matthew Palmer
Next by Thread: [Xen-users] Re: Java non-performant in a domU? , Matthew Palmer
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /