WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] Xen Partition Performance

To: Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Xen Partition Performance
From: Luis Rodrigues <l17173@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年4月26日 10:22:25 +0100 (WEST)
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2006年4月26日 02:23:07 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200604251528.58046.mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ok.
So I will use LVM for the data. Does any one have any numbers for the
performance of Xen with some of the choices (since I need to present my
boss)
Thanks for your help.
Luis
On 2006年4月25日, Mark Williamson wrote:
> > I have a question who may be complet your question ... What is the best
> > File Back-End VBD for more stability and performance ? If i use SAN to
> > stock data, Nfs, Gfs ??
>
> You mean what's the best way to store domU FSes in file-backed VBDs?
>
> Best if you don't put File VBDs onto NFS. Both NFS and the loopback block 
> driver use a load of RAM, and they tend to OOM when used together. Also, the 
> performance will probably be bad.
>
> SANs are nice ;-) There have been threads on using GFS to store guest disk 
> files recently. Has the advantage of making live-migration easier.
>
> Better performing might be to run CLVM on the SAN so that all dom0's can see 
> logical volumes stored there, then use logical volumes directly. Lower 
> overhead than using the filesystem layer.
>
> I've not tried this, so it's speculation on my part ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
> -- 
> Dave: Just a question. What use is a unicyle with no seat? And no pedals!
> Mark: To answer a question with a question: What use is a skateboard?
> Dave: Skateboards have wheels.
> Mark: My wheel has a wheel!
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] poor performance on nFORCE MB with Xen 3.0.2 linux-2.6.16-xen , Vincent Hanquez
Next by Date: [Xen-users] mac addresses domUs , Mike A. Kenny
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] Xen Partition Performance , Christopher G. Stach II
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] Xen Partition Performance , Mark Williamson
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /