WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-users] PAE performance cost on an Dual Opteron 265 with 8GB of RAM

To: Xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-users] PAE performance cost on an Dual Opteron 265 with 8GB of RAM
From: "Robert Hulme" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年4月18日 10:37:16 +0100
Delivery-date: 2006年4月18日 02:37:55 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=qxL7DBDqmw9bldF2Eouj5VoN/uCmjJwpb5j72drvF3pCxq23Nk6LzrZwa3IvH3mNqL5RfTG9DPKflmeUwC3qoonHJT/gPfwHDYsfPCJR4jACrwf8tGoPIeZg7GP1j6+U2wDj/yC/s+0UtZ9LApnOCnIvXuTdIuFSL8Z1Zy4zwIE=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
I have a dual 265 with 8GB of RAM. I was planning on putting the 64
bit build of Xen on it but a friend of mine is a bit of a NetBSD bunny
and so I am considering putting the 32 bit build on as NetBSD doesn't
work on Opteron/64 bits.
As far as I'm aware to access all 8GB of memory I'll need to enable
PAE on xen? Is this correct?
None of the DomU's will have more than 1GB of RAM (probably none will
have that much - most likely 512MB max). Am I right in thinking that
all the Linux kernels will need PAE turned on? I get that impression
from http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2005-11/msg00442.html
There is a performance overhead with PAE isn't there? What kind of hit
am I looking at? Is it something to be worried about? >10% ? I know
that question is moderately unanswerable in a strong sense but a feel
would be really handy.
Thanks guys
-Rob
--
------------------------------------------------------
"Which exclusive club are: My mother, my ex, and Patricia Measham a
member of? They're all people who have spanked me!" -Rob
"But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over
them—bring them here and kill them in front of me." - Jesus (Luke
19:27)
http://www.robhulme.com/
http://robhu.livejournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] Hardware compatibility - Dell Inspiron 6400 or thinkpad t60? , Sven Oehme
Next by Date: [Xen-users] xen3.0.2 on sarge: domU non created , Emiliano Gabrielli (aka AlberT)
Previous by Thread: [Xen-users] Quick question on uninstallation , Srinivasan S
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] PAE performance cost on an Dual Opteron 265 with 8GB of RAM , John Madden
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /