WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Xen-users] Re: Access Hypervisor Control from DomU

To: "XEN User - listmembers" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Re: Access Hypervisor Control from DomU
From: "John Cianfarani" <jcianfarani@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年3月31日 01:33:13 -0500
Cc: Stephan Seitz <s.seitz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2006年3月31日 06:37:05 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-class:Date:Message-ID:X-MimeOLE:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Thread-Topic:thread-index:From:To:Cc; b=srUiWtN76BXZUgKBssjUAloTUTllud3PKy15LEW7BGKIZH1lark7B9sVLkYZwW4WaBsaYorft4zjjCnEwLSGBemkuOW3qRMtJaP3afWU3NBnIYUkOUKMPgyBFRYP0ftpPqlmlanz9CwsMsB61wMegN5qD/lZ0C7m6cm6sdEqNsA= ;
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcZUL/9UlPuU43tiRp+oOq7PTc7y/AAXK2cQ
Thread-topic: [Xen-users] Re: Access Hypervisor Control from DomU
Look into using heartbeat with DRBD failover would probably be less than
a few second hit. Data would also be safe :)
This is better than trying to migrate a domU after the box has died... 
Thanks
John
-----Original Message-----
From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephan
Seitz
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 2:26 PM
To: XEN User - listmembers
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Access Hypervisor Control from DomU
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
John Smith schrieb:
> Nils Toedtmann wrote:
>>
>>
>> I remember reading that the only real difference between a dom0
>> and a domU kernel is the priviledge to have access to the
>> hypervisor. Why not declaring a special domU to a "fallback"
>> dom0? Not in the sense of having access to hw but control over
>> the hypervisor.
>>
>> That would help if the original dom0 userland dies, but it's
>> kernel keeps forwarding/bridging packets and blockdevice-I/O,
>> like Stephan's dom0 did.
>>
>> /nils.
>>
Thanks for this hint, Nils. I'll try to setup another test system with
two dom0's,
just to see if this is possible. I'll post results if this leads to a
running system.
> Hi,
>
> if this would be a problem you would have to deal with in the real
> world, you would have a identical box on another location and move
> the domU's to it and reboot the problem box.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Jan.
This was my first thought, but we didn't setup a fallback system (the
one, i
talked about, is just for testing purposes installed). Also, this
machine has all
it's filesystems on local disk, so a domU migration would last longer
than
driving to the colo. For live systems, i would also prefer this
scenario, but i think
this is not managable without the use of a NAS/SAN.
Greetings
Stephan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFELDDSsU1z66G/Ui4RAu9EAKCMWclUJReeM5WGRBaS05HrQmK10wCfRtQL
RHIjP0k/dy9ZxHaq3LwU4DQ=
=kTZE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: [Xen-users] Re: Access Hypervisor Control from DomU, John Cianfarani <=
Previous by Date: [Xen-users] Is # of VMs per physical host limited by bridging? , Amitayu Das
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-users] Problems with pygrub: ValueError: unableto open file , Michael Paesold
Previous by Thread: [Xen-users] Is # of VMs per physical host limited by bridging? , Amitayu Das
Next by Thread: [Xen-users] Network errors, but only with sftp , Marcus Roberts
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /