| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] OpenSolaris 10 on x86_32 Xen-VTx |
| From: | Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2006年1月30日 23:09:47 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | 2006年1月30日 22:19:32 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BrZUmbMhAuksvK7ZFznYLr/sTW+MuLpwnT8gA4FXFefrVFA96fgGbAGE2wp4gjJbjwn2LEISlFv1O1QR90Hl4+aU3L7jbIyx5iU+0+mSHRzlhuIIftncaGhnKjNurnyAM9lcI5vOJj605MFioZ54jpXS2jgYmbRByFu9azCio1c= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <EF8D308BE33AF54D8934DF26520252D303ADA991@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <EF8D308BE33AF54D8934DF26520252D303ADA991@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Here's a quick note for those who's trying to keep up with the thread but does not have RBIL handy :-). Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh wrote: > ata0 master: QEMU HARDDISK ATA-2 Hard-Disk (2048 MBytes) > ata0 slave: Unknown device > ata1 master: QEMU CD-ROM ATAPI-4 CD-Rom/DVD-Rom > ata1 slave: Unknown device > > Booting from CD-Rom... > int13_harddisk: function 41, unmapped device for ELDL=81 IBM/MS INT 13 Extensions - INSTALLATION CHECK 0x81: Disk nr. 2, that could be the CDROM. I'd immediately think that the CDROM would only get 0x81 if the El Torito image on it is in "HD emulation mode". But the specs actually say that a "no emulation" image will get any arbitrary BIOS drive id from 0x81 to 0xFF, so I guess it's OK. Except for the obvious "unmapped device" message. > int13_harddisk: function 08, unmapped device for ELDL=81 DISK - GET DRIVE PARAMETERS (PC,XT286,CONV,PS,ESDI,SCSI) > *** int 15h function AX=00C0, BX=0000 not yet supported! Not documented? > *** int 15h function AX=5300, BX=0000 not yet supported! Advanced Power Management v1.0+ - INSTALLATION CHECK Easy to emulate, but I think you've got bigger problems with the int 13h stuff failing above. > *** int 15h function AX=5304, BX=0000 not yet supported! Advanced Power Management v1.0+ - DISCONNECT INTERFACE _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-users] Xen 3 and SuSe 10 , Jimmy Pierre |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-users] Strange Xen arithmetic ("Error creating domain: I need 65 MiB, but dom0_min_mem is 196...") , Stephane Bortzmeyer |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Xen-users] OpenSolaris 10 on x86_32 Xen-VTx , Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Xen-users] OpenSolaris 10 on x86_32 Xen-VTx , Ian Pratt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |