WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] Xen and iSCSI

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Xen and iSCSI
From: Markus Hochholdinger <Markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2006年1月30日 00:53:03 +0100
Delivery-date: 2006年1月30日 00:02:44 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <43DD3A76.6010609@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200601281724.47989.Markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200601291400.14736.Markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43DD3A76.6010609@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.7.2
Hi,
Am Sonntag, 29. Januar 2006 22:58 schrieb Alvin Starr:
> Markus Hochholdinger wrote:
[..]
> >well, my idea of HA is as follows:
> > - Two storage servers on individual SANs connected to the Xen hosts. Each
> >storage server provides block devices per iscsi.
> > - On domU two iscsi block devices are combined to a raid1. On this raid1
> > we will have the rootfs.
> We are doing doing this. Well sort of.
> We are having the dom0 attach to the iscsi devices and then pass them up
> as hda/hdb. The domU's deal with the raiding of the devices.
And the domU makes the raid1?
> My reason for doing this is that the domU's don't need any access to the
> network that contains the iscsi devices and has all the iscsi
> information hidden from them so that they don't know anthing about the
> arrays.
Yes, thats a good point.
> All my dom0's have access to the all the iscsi devices so that
> migration is possible.
But you have to take care that no two dom0s write to the same iscsi target!
> I have done the resync thing to upgrade the storage server software. It
> is a pain but it is do-able.
Sounds not that good i hoped.
> The other advantages hold true even if the dom0's attach to the iscsi
> devices.
Yes.
> >Disadvantages:
> > - When one storage server dies ALL domU have to rebuild their raid1 when
> >storage this storage server comes back. High traffic on the SANs.
> > - Not easy to setup a new domU in this environment (lvm, iscsi, raid1)
> Rebuilding the arrays can suck back a lot of network bandwidth. It is
> much better to rebuild the raid arrays consecutivly. rebuilding them
> concurrently really slows things down and causes the drives in the iscsi
> targets to really go mad seeking.
OK.
> building a new domU is quite easy.
> I build the raid array in the dom0 and then mount it locally and extract
> a minimal install onto the array. I then unmount the array and stop the
> raid. I can then boot the domU.
> then ..... bob's your uncle.
It is easy to handle for the domUs.
-- 
greetings
eMHa

Attachment: pgpD89aJtgmLF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] Xen and iSCSI , Markus Hochholdinger
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] Xen and iSCSI , Javier Guerra
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] Xen and iSCSI , Alvin Starr
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] Xen and iSCSI , Javier Guerra
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /