You'll want the xen-unstable sources which are pre-3.0. :-)
gino
On 9/24/05, Mike Kowalchik <mike.pk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> At least superficially all materials there are talking about xen 2.0
> (or alternatively 2.0.7) and not 3.0. I've seen people mention 3.0,
> and that it's in testing. I guess the source tarballs for 2.0 testing
> are really for 3.0? I guess it's not very clear (to me at least)
> where 3.0 is. Most of what comes up from a search for 3.0 is some ppt
> slides on architecture, roadmap, and some messages regarding a
> release schedule.
>
> -MikeK
>
>
> On Sep 24, 2005, at 12:01 PM, DEMAINE Benoit-Pierre wrote:
>
> > did you search on http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/ ?
> >
> > where else any one would ?
> >
> > --
> > DEMAINE Benoit-Pierre (aka DoubleHP ) http://www.demaine.info/ 
> > \_o< If computing were an exact science, IT engineers would not
> > have work >o_/
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users