| To: | nigel.head@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] Multiple Domains Sharing Root System |
| From: | Nicholas Lee <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2005年9月20日 18:55:10 +1200 |
| Cc: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | 2005年9月20日 06:52:57 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NCEavazlGLzSFvWMb/sPKvWFPSg6xO2gW5Sc01LjrKQ3q63jT+D8rVBAqqbpc/noLGxWrkbYVS5K5XuWnvRcdJDHN8KvETxgnhyVdFN/kR/besVCMCLXbeSSKKONoWJtzbGhNcR34k7fQV8sQvXjxXh7CoiSZE3FoenUaK8zKbw= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <c3c11b6c05091923245e6e19db@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <432F36FB.6040302@xxxxxxxxx> <c3c11b6c05091923245e6e19db@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | emptysands@xxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 9/20/05, Nigel Head <nigel.head@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 1) Assume disk space is cheapish but "keep things up to date" admin effort > is expensive (my problem, at any rate) > > 2) Make completely independent filesystems for each domU This is what I think as well. Especially since in most cases 1Gb is often more that sufficient for simple domains. That said, having the filesystems for data independent is very useful. OCFS2 or the new Xen filesystem probably be good here. At the moment I've used NFS mostly for this, or in some cases just more lvm-device mount points around by changing configs and restarting. NFS is not the best solution of single machine Xen based setups, has some performance issues I haven't been able to find the time to track down. > > 3) Use cfengine (www.cfengine.org) to propagate changes and updates .... > > Concerning 3 this might be an opportune moment to ask if anyone has > experience of cfengine? On paper it looks like a rather neat solution to the > problem it's trying to address. I figure this as well. Of course being able to generalise the unknown aspect of your sysadmin muscles in your head to some config language is another story. :) -- Nicholas Lee http://stateless.geek.nz gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF 5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Multiple Domains Sharing Root System , Nigel Head |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Xen-users] How to create a guest image NEWBIE!!!! , JHJE (Jan Holst Jensen) |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Multiple Domains Sharing Root System , Nigel Head |
| Next by Thread: | Re; [Xen-users] does vifname work in 2.07? , master |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |