| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen installation |
| From: | Timur Irmatov <irmatov@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 7 Sep 2005 13:07:59 +0500 |
| Delivery-date: | 2005年9月07日 08:06:01 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=beO6YdZpj3AtFoJ5Gj/7uNLgfFkPGBjAFP9WLpyyZghsBKglEyiwPaSIkdMmKNPZqWriezhh1B9hcLKDU1M6e/0yx+cWXOO/WIiSAg7tS+cjQJp1ZnoNJ0r6kEWTp2wxzF8JD6MOM6ZJNPajr0LGpqndCoDr1iZgpMmCu3ZJYvM= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <C3077285E500D5118C7300508BB3D9170C10BD49@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <C3077285E500D5118C7300508BB3D9170C10BD49@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | irmatov@xxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 9/7/05, Petersson, Mats <mats.petersson@xxxxxxx> wrote: > The Xen kernel itself uses some memory, both directly (about half a meg > or so), and dynamically allocated (some megabytes, definitely > 4MB). > You may want to try a binary search between 80 and 90, but my guess is > that you'll end up closer to 80 than 90. > > The Dom0 memory is really that, it's memory used for the kernel that is > loaded as Domain0, not counting memory that the Xen kernel itself needs. I got it, thanks for clarifications.. > > > > Second question: when domU boots, I see a lot of 'Warning: > > failed update VA mapping'.. But machine boots successfully.. > > Is this sign of some problem? In mailing list archive I see some reports of problems with 2.6.12 kernel. Does anybody has positive experience with 2.6.12 kernel? May be I should switch to 2.6.11, before I get into any troubles.. :) -- Timur Irmatov, JID: thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-users] Re: Xen installation , Petersson, Mats |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Re: xen 2.0.7 on VIA C3 (EPIA) , Helmut Wollmersdorfer |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Xen-users] Re: Xen installation , Petersson, Mats |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen installation , als |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |