| To: | Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] Has 2.4 kernel support ended on xen? |
| From: | Shahzad Chohan <shahzad.chohan@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 2 Aug 2005 12:58:35 +0100 |
| Cc: | ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | 2005年8月02日 11:57:02 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dT7LkJUzcKPwi6NHjdNZIjOGVZierU8da4pFtgGRICbSCetFgx09gHr1dgUmfiuqwH1TUsWsWYibeSboy6nuE4yUCvFVB0JvtOIusDhbmglTOT1FVp3Fcj0ciDiOXWa8lHWR/okGsmCBHiSzVVt6oXJLROZEc/ROkqhX4eF/Bzw= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D2828CF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D2828CF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Shahzad Chohan <shahzad.chohan@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 8/2/05, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I was just wondering whether the xen team has stopped > > supporting the 2.4 kernel? > > It's always been a low priority activity, but the intention is for Xen 3 > to be able to support mainstream Linux 2.4 as a domU, but not as a dom0. > > > Basically the reason why I ask is becuase everytime I've > > tried to build the 2.4 xen kernel under xen 3.0 (unstable) I > > keep getting errors (usually about usb) so it made me wonder > > whether the xen patches are being maintained. > > I think that's actually quite a trivial fix. In fact, I seem to recall > fixing the same error at some point a few weeks, ago, so it may just be > a case of a mercurial accident causing something to be resurrected. > > Patches welcome :-) We could even have a 2.4 port maintainer... > Hey thanks for the reply. I'd love to maintain something like that, but I don't know how to program well in C. Although I'vw written basic C programs I've never dealt with a complex C program. Is there a way to just build the 2.4 xenU kernel, without the xen0 kernel? Many Thanks Shaz _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Burst Ram for Dom-U , Daniel Hulme |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Troubles compiling xen , Cristiano Paris |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Xen-users] Has 2.4 kernel support ended on xen? , Ian Pratt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Has 2.4 kernel support ended on xen? , Mark Williamson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |