WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-users] virtual routing issue

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] virtual routing issue
From: Ernie Fontes <ernie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2005年7月22日 16:22:35 -0400
Delivery-date: 2005年7月22日 20:21:26 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

A most puzzling network conundrum has arisen while I was attempting to create a virtual network behind a virtual router which in turn connects the virtual network to my real network.

My machine (192.168.103.23) is on the network with my router (192.168.103.1). The virtual router, tiara, has to connect my

192.168.103.* network with the virtual 10.0.0.* network which comprises two other virtual domains, tophat and bowler.

The three virtual machines are all running Fedora (hence the names).

I can ping between tiara, tophat, and bowler. I can also ping from tiara out to 192.168.103.1, 192.168.103.23, and the Internet.

However, I cannot ping 192.168.103.23, 192.168.103.1, or the Internet from tophat or bowler (which are routed through tiara).

I am reasonable certain that the problem has nothing to do with Domain-0. In fact, I am almost positive that the guilt here rests on tiara. Tiara is apparently not passing packets from one of its ethernet cards to the other.

To further puzzle things, bowler and tophat are able to ping exactly two IP addresses on the 192.168.103.* network:

[root@localhost ~]# ping 192.168.103.0

PING 192.168.103.0 (192.168.103.0) 56(84) bytes of data.

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.00 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.218 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.158 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.170 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.156 ms

--- 192.168.103.0 ping statistics ---

5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4007ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.156/0.341/1.007/0.334 ms, pipe 2

[root@localhost ~]# ping 192.168.103.30

PING 192.168.103.30 (192.168.103.30) 56(84) bytes of data.

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.18 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.173 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.160 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.177 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.194 ms

--- 192.168.103.30 ping statistics ---

5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4007ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.160/0.376/1.180/0.402 ms, pipe 2

Upon examination, it becomes apparent that tiara is, in fact, replying to pings at both 192.168.103.30 and 192.168.103.0 (and 10.0.0.1, of course).

Any suggestions on how to fix tiara would be greatly appreciated. I have tried everything I could think to try.

The ifconfig and route results for all three virtual machines are attached below.

Ernie E Fontes

-----------tiara:-----------

[root@localhost ~]# ifconfig

eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr AA:00:00:27:00:F5

inet addr:192.168.103.30 Bcast:192.168.103.255 Mask:255.255.255.0

UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1

RX packets:926 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

TX packets:24 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000

RX bytes:121636 (118.7 KiB) TX bytes:1560 (1.5 KiB)

eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr AA:00:00:4C:48:35

inet addr:10.0.0.1 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0

UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1

RX packets:755 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

TX packets:9 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000

RX bytes:105949 (103.4 KiB) TX bytes:414 (414.0 b)

lo Link encap:Local Loopback

inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0

UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1

RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 [root@localhost ~]# ping 192.168.103.0 PING 192.168.103.0 (192.168.103.0) 56(84) bytes of data.

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.00 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.218 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.158 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.170 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.156 ms

--- 192.168.103.0 ping statistics ---

5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4007ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.156/0.341/1.007/0.334 ms, pipe 2 [root@localhost ~]# ping 192.168.103.30 PING 192.168.103.30 (192.168.103.30) 56(84) bytes of data.

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.18 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.173 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.160 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.177 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.103.30: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.194 ms

--- 192.168.103.30 ping statistics ---

5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4007ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.160/0.376/1.180/0.402 ms, pipe 2 overruns:0 frame:0

TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

collisions:0 txqueuelen:0

RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)

[root@localhost ~]# route

Kernel IP routing table

Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface

192.168.103.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0

10.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth1

default 192.168.103.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

-----------bowler:-----------

[root@localhost ~]# ifconfig

eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr AA:00:00:0C:15:FC

inet addr:10.0.0.3 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0

UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1

RX packets:1108 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

TX packets:145 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000

RX bytes:147230 (143.7 KiB) TX bytes:13562 (13.2 KiB)

lo Link encap:Local Loopback

inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0

UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1

RX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

collisions:0 txqueuelen:0

RX bytes:660 (660.0 b) TX bytes:660 (660.0 b)

[root@localhost ~]# route

Kernel IP routing table

Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface

192.168.103.0 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

10.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0

-----------tophat:-----------

[root@localhost ~]# ifconfig

eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr AA:00:00:28:71:5E

inet addr:10.0.0.2 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0

UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1

RX packets:1273 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

TX packets:24 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000

RX bytes:163399 (159.5 KiB) TX bytes:1984 (1.9 KiB)

lo Link encap:Local Loopback

inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0

UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1

RX packets:20 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0

TX packets:20 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0

collisions:0 txqueuelen:0

RX bytes:1644 (1.6 KiB) TX bytes:1644 (1.6 KiB)

[root@localhost ~]# route

Kernel IP routing table

Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface

192.168.103.0 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

10.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [Xen-users] Which distributed file system for xen hosts/guests? , master
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] relation between vcpu and domain , Daniel Hulme
Previous by Thread: [Xen-users] Which distributed file system for xen hosts/guests? , master
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] virtual routing issue , Michal Ludvig
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /