WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] relation between vcpu and domain

To: Miguel Filipe <miguel.filipe@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] relation between vcpu and domain
From: Diwaker Gupta <diwaker.lists@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2005年7月22日 11:53:30 -0700
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: 2005年7月22日 18:52:34 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UvRNU6v2ogaC7cU/KWQj1nPExpsZY3Ex73UCbe2mUNLprMK2cAphSSH5U3KlnW/EWgBrxJMZFc/5/PMi901tx01rLzIHmWsuN+qqcFRdStkLz7uPYXhwZ2MOdqWf4JDAryKTwQMxFkKlkj/ZPizY1VEjs08zprc10Qd3K4fpkxM=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <f058a9c30507211620614fa392@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <891be94105072114216716c0ee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f058a9c30507211620614fa392@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Diwaker Gupta <diwaker.lists@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> what you've said basically is a discription of a design to comprise that a
> VPU belongs to only one domain, but each domain can have several VPUs..
> Why should a VPU migrate? From that description I would assume that VPUs
> don't migrate from domain.. but they (possibly) can be removed from a domain
> has long has this stays with at least one VPU, and can be added to a domain,
> if such vpu isn't assigned to a domain yet...
Not the VPU, I was suggesting perhaps the domain migrates from one
VCPU to another.
> If that's true, there wouldn't be SMP for domains, since they are
> assossiated with only one VPU.
I thought SMP support for guests was still not functional. AFAIK,
domains are still pinned to a single CPU. Am I wrong?
It'll be great if someone with more authoritative knowledge can shed a
light on this :)
Diwaker
-- 
Web/Blog/Gallery: http://floatingsun.net
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-users] Re: IPtables support in xen for the domU , Ernst Bachmann
Next by Date: [Xen-users] Which distributed file system for xen hosts/guests? , master
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] relation between vcpu and domain , Miguel Filipe
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-users] relation between vcpu and domain , Daniel Hulme
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /