On Wed, 2011年03月16日 at 16:21 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 04:08:14PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011年03月16日 at 15:58 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > > 2/5 depends on Rafael tree so will have to wait until that gets 
> > > > > merged in.
> > > > > But we can definitly push those two (1/5 and 2/5) right when Rafael's 
> > > > > tree
> > > > > has been merged.
> > > > 
> > > > Does it? Why?
> > > > 
> > > > If it's just the minor conflict in arch/x86/xen/Kconfig I say throw it
> > > > in and let it get resolved at merge time.
> > > 
> > > I get this rejection:
> > [...]
> > 
> > Did you take 1/5? 2/5 needs it.
>
> Yes. I created a new branch based off linus/master, and did git am -s < ~/save
>
> cat ~/save | grep Message
> Message-Id: <1299906435-30927-1-git-send-email-rshriram@xxxxxxxxx>
> Message-Id: <1299906420-30885-1-git-send-email-rshriram@xxxxxxxxx>
> konrad@phenom:~/work/linux$ cat ~/save | grep Subject:
> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/5] xen: use freeze/restore/thaw PM events
> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/5] xen: xenbus PM events support
Those subjects look backwards?
>
> > 
> > Ian.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel