On Fri, 2011年03月04日 at 09:29 +0000, Frank Pan wrote:
> > Is the issue you are seeing perhaps due to this patch being missing from
> > that tree?
> >
> > commit a947f0f8f7012a5e8689a9cff7209ec6964ec154
> > Author: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Mon Oct 4 16:10:06 2010 +0100
> >
> > xen: do not set xenstored_ready before xenbus_probe on hvm
>
> > Stefano's "2.6.38-rc6-pvhvm" branch also contains this which looks
> > related:
> >
> > commit 702d4eb9b3de4398ab99cf0a4e799e552c7ab756
> > Author: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Thu Dec 2 17:54:50 2010 +0000
> >
> > xen: no need to delay xen_setup_shutdown_event for hvm guests anymore
>
> FP: Yes, both commits seem like a solution of the issue I met.
>
> > If possible we should prefer to backport patches from newer kernels
> > rather than diverge in the 2.6.32 branch.
>
> FP: The former commit seems ok. The latter one is more like a cleanup.
> Here is a patch can be applied on xen/next-2.6.32:
Thanks, but we should just cherry pick the original.
I actually pulled this patch into the Debian Squeeze (2.6.32.x) kernel a
while ago and it hasn't caused any problems TTBOMK. I kept forgetting to
forward it on.
Pull request below includes this path and a second one which I also
pulled into the Debian kernel.
Jeremy, please can you pull.
Ian.
The following changes since commit 892d2f052e979cf1916647c752b94cf62ec1c6dc:
 Jeremy Fitzhardinge (1):
 Merge commit 'v2.6.32.28' into xen/next-2.6.32
are available in the git repository at:
 git://xenbits.xen.org/people/ianc/linux-2.6.git pvhvm-2.6.32
Stefano Stabellini (2):
 xen: do not set xenstored_ready before xenbus_probe on hvm
 xen: do not initialize PV timers on HVM if !xen_have_vector_callback
 arch/x86/xen/time.c | 5 +++--
 drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c | 8 ++++++--
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel