On 17/12/2010 15:03, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("[xen-unstable test] 4041: regressions - FAIL"):
>> flight 4041 xen-unstable real [real]
>> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/4041/ 
>> 
>> Regressions :-(
>> 
>> tests which did not succeed:
>> test-amd64-amd64-pv 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 3001
>
> This seems to be a genuine bug. The dom0 kernel fails to start for
> some reason. The last serial console message is something like this:
>
> Dec 17 11:24:00.518681 (XEN) Dom0 has maximum 4 VCPUs
> Dec 17 11:24:00.518704 (XEN) elf_load_binary: phdr 0 at 0x00000000c1000000 ->
> 0x00000000c167b000
> Dec 17 11:24:00.533686 (XEN) elf_load_binary: phdr 1 at 0x00000000c167b000 ->
> 0x00000000c1774000
>
> It fails every time on earwig, gall-mite, itch-mite (Intel) and passes
> every time on leaf-beetle, potato-beetle, woodlouse (AMD).
Boots for me, with my own dom0 kernel. Could be a Linux dom0 regression? If
not, will need to wait for this to be bisected to less than a 100-changeset
range.
 -- Keir
> Ian.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel