WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re-define PKT_PROT_LEN to be bigger.

To: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re-define PKT_PROT_LEN to be bigger.
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2010年12月15日 09:37:33 +0000
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2010年12月15日 01:38:22 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1292358922-5569-1-git-send-email-paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc.
References: <1292358922-5569-1-git-send-email-paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2010年12月14日 at 20:35 +0000, Paul Durrant wrote:
> Re-define PKT_PROT_LEN to be big enough to handle maximal IPv4 and TCP 
> options and phrase
> the definition so that it's reasonably obvious that's what it's for.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/xen/netback/netback.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/netback/netback.c b/drivers/xen/netback/netback.c
> index c448675..1a4a20e 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/netback/netback.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/netback/netback.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static inline int netif_get_page_ext(struct page *pg, 
> unsigned int *_group, unsi
> * packet processing on them (netfilter, routing, etc). 72 is enough
Missed this comment.
> * to cover TCP+IP headers including options.
> */
> -#define PKT_PROT_LEN 72
> +#define PKT_PROT_LEN (ETH_HLEN + 4 + (15 * 4) + (15 * 4))
Clearer as:
#define ETH_HLEN_VLAN_HLEN + \
 MAX_IPOPTLEN + sizeof(struct iphdr) + \
 MAX_TCP_OPTION_SPACE + sizeof(struct tcphdr)
?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re-define PKT_PROT_LEN to be bigger. , Paul Durrant
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/6] xen-gntdev: Fix circular locking dependency , Ian Campbell
Previous by Thread: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re-define PKT_PROT_LEN to be bigger. , Paul Durrant
Next by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re-define PKT_PROT_LEN to be bigger. , Ian Campbell
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /