| To: | "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] iommu=0 leading to panic when system defaults to using x2apic |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 2010年12月10日 09:12:21 +0000 |
| Delivery-date: | 2010年12月10日 01:13:23 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Why wouldn't iommu=0 imply not using the x2apic, if use of the iommu indeed is a prerequisite (which by itself seems questionable as long as APIC IDs aren't wider than 8 bits)? Looking further at enable_bsp_x2apic(), I also wonder whether the pre-enabled case, when specifying iommu=0 and x2apic=0, can actually work if iommu=0 is a prerequisite (intremap_enabled() would return 1 in that case afaics, so the early check doesn't help). Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/5] libxl: strdup disk path before put it in qemu args array. , Ian Campbell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: Use xenbus to communicate with xenstore if the socket fails , Mihir Nanavati |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen : Replace hard coded domain_id checks with a macro , Mihir Nanavati |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] iommu=0 leading to panic when system defaults to using x2apic , Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |