At 10:20 +0100 on 20 Apr (1271758826), Christoph Egger wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 April 2010 11:12:32 Tim Deegan wrote:
> > At 08:41 +0100 on 20 Apr (1271752877), Christoph Egger wrote:
> > > On Friday 16 April 2010 12:45:35 Tim Deegan wrote:
> > > > Nacked pending performance eval.
> > > >
> > > > BTW, if perf turns out not be a problem, I welcome this with open arms;
> > > > always nice to see a patch that removes a lot of code.
> > >
> > > kernbench performance numbers on 64bit xen:
> >
> > Looking good. :)
>
> Yes.
>
> > What was the guest?
>
> SLES10SP3
64bit, HVM?
> > And what about 32bit Xen?
>
> I provide the numbers when I have them.
Thanks.
Tim.
--
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Principal Software Engineer, XenServer Engineering
Citrix Systems UK Ltd. (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG)
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel