WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] network performance drop heavily in xen 4.0 release

To: yingbin wang <yingbin.wangyb@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] network performance drop heavily in xen 4.0 release
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Date: 2010年4月16日 08:56:52 +0300
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2010年4月15日 22:57:54 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <k2oacd07b8d1004152124l2778fda7nbed7b38fb8cddb0d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <x2kacd07b8d1004150939z742015daze69f618b8ee73b9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C7ED0287.116B2%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <k2oacd07b8d1004152124l2778fda7nbed7b38fb8cddb0d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008年05月17日)
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:24:12PM +0800, yingbin wang wrote:
> sorry, I forgot to report the performance of xen4.0+kernel2.6.18.8.
>
> xen4.0+kernel2.6.18.8:
> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
> [ 4] 0.0-16.3 sec 1.79 GBytes 941 Mbits/sec
>
> This combination can only meet some of our needs.
>
> the reason why we didn't use 2.6.18.8:
> 1. Our storage application is base on NBD, which will goto deadlock
> on 2.6.18.8 when nbd-client and nbd-server are deployed on the same
> server.
> 2. Hard disk frequently offline
>
Do you have Xen credit scheduler weights properly configured? 
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenBestPractices
> so we want to upgrade to kernel2.6.31.
> we also try xen4.0+kernel2.6.31.12(gentoo-xen-kernel patch). the
> performance is acceptable, but blktap2(support VHD) not work.
> has anybody solve the problem in xen4.0+kernel2.6.31.13?
>
You could try pvops dom0 kernel from xen/stable-2.6.32.x branch aswell:
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps
-- Pasi
> Cheers,
> wyb
>
> 2010年4月16日 Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On 15/04/2010 17:39, "yingbin wang" <yingbin.wangyb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>     I report a Bug !!!  We have just upgraded to
> >> xen4.0+kernel2.6.31.13 recently.  however , fond that the network
> >> performance drop heavily in dom0  (nearly Reduced by 2/3 vs
> >> xen3.4.2+kernel2.6.18.8 ) .
> >
> > How does xen4.0+kernel2.6.18.8 perform? The regression is more likely in the
> > dom0 kernel than Xen itself. And you don't *have* to upgrade both.
> >
> >  -- Keir
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] network performance drop heavily in xen 4.0 release , yingbin wang
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Trying to compile Xen 4 for a Debian package fail , Martinx - ジェームズ
Previous by Thread: Re: [Xen-devel] network performance drop heavily in xen 4.0 release , yingbin wang
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] Re: network performance drop heavily in xen 4.0 release , yingbin wang
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /