On 12/04/2010 14:14, "Andre Przywara" <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I'd hope that Xen could follow their lead on this rather
>> than forge new ground, which may result in an incompatible
>> implementation.
> Until c/s 21118 Xen was just fine, reporting 8 nodes, 4 sockets and 48
> cores. It is just this socket per node (which got removed some years
> ago), which is doing harm. (BTW: I already complained about that last
> year, when Nitin's patch first appeared on the ML).
Okay, well I will revert the patch if we reach no further consensus.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel