WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Xen

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: domU oom -> xvda1 read-only without any notice?

To: Ferenc Wagner <wferi@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: domU oom -> xvda1 read-only without any notice?
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:11:41 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: 2010年4月01日 07:12:05 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <87oci3tgc6.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc.
References: <20100331074950.GA18028@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C7D8CA1D.F509%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100331085245.GA32106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100331091711.GA3434@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1270032395.10129.72604.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87oci3tgc6.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2010年04月01日 at 15:09 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2010年03月31日 at 10:17 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Is it possible that this (which I presume is a flag set in the
> > filesystem metadata):
> >
> >> [ 9.996577] EXT3-fs warning (device xvda1): ext3_clear_journal_err: 
> >> Filesystem error recorded from previous mount: IO failure
> >> [ 9.996585] EXT3-fs warning (device xvda1): ext3_clear_journal_err: 
> >> Marking fs in need of filesystem check.
> >
> > would also have caused the filesystem to reject attempts to remount,rw
> > before the reboot until you rebooted and fsck ran?
> >
> > I took a look at your logs (other mail) and I can't see any mention of
> > an IO error on xvda either -- I must admit I'm pretty perplexed :-(
>
> OTOH you shouldn't be surprised about not finding anything in the logs
> about the filesystem being read-only. :)
Doh, yes, right ;)
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: domU oom -> xvda1 read-only without any notice? , Ferenc Wagner
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 4] xl: vcpu commands and tsc_mode parameter , Eric Chanudet
Previous by Thread: [Xen-devel] Re: domU oom -> xvda1 read-only without any notice? , Ferenc Wagner
Next by Thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 4] xl: vcpu commands and tsc_mode parameter , Eric Chanudet
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Copyright ©, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy
Citrix This site is hosted by Citrix

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /